Re: Floyd vs Prince Naz
In the period of time that their careers intersected, they were on completely different trajectories.
Naz started off as a freak ..... he had unbelievable reflexes, confidence, he genuinely liked to hurt people, and he had eye opening power.
By the time that Floyd was on the scene, he was parting company with the trainers who created him, was shirking training and his reflexes had begun to deteriorate (and once that happened, he didn't have the ingrained technique to get away with it). He was also, in my view, fighting well above the weight he should have been.
Later on, Floyd was a true master boxer with superb technique, great ring generalship and a formidable array of weapons at his disposal. Early on though, he was unproven and he left himself much more open to being countered as he was much more aggressive.
If they had fought each other AT THAT time, I think Floyd would have prevailed. It wouldn't have been an easy fight, but he would be a lot bigger than Naz and at some point The Prince would have found his power wouldn't carry up. There would be a fair bit of risk to Floyd at this stage, but he was a hungry guy on the way up then. I think he was just better schooled and trained than Naseem was.
If you picked a hypothetical matchup between the two, based on them at their respective peaks, then there is no contest for me. Mayweather dominates, defuses Naz and makes him look stupid for twelve rather boring rounds,
Last edited by Master; 05-09-2017 at 06:19 AM.
If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?
Bookmarks