I'm with the Fury's on this
One fighter (AJ) is allowed to apply for an extension that would enable him to fight a Wlad rematch, keep his IBF title then fight the IBF mandatory at a later date.
The Other fighter wasn't even allowed to apply for an extension to the IBF and was ordered within days of beating Wlad that he had to fight his mandatory against Glazkov or be stripped of his belt.
Exactly the same situation but one fighter is allowed to apply for an extension and the other is not.
How exactly is that fair?
Fury's camp are incensed that they were not afforded the luxury of having their request heard by the IBF because Joshua is effectively in the same situation that Fury found himself.
https://www.joe.co.uk/sport/tyson-fu...-joshua-125914
Bookmarks