I'm having trouble understanding this, what legal footing are you lot standing on when you're demanding those empty buildings be filled with these people who are out of a home because of a tragic fire?

If you're saying "The government needs to just take it" then I'm sorry THAT is tyrannical. Now while you may see it as "unfeeling" or "cold hearted" that ain't a part of the contract that went in to acquiring that property, there's no clause that says "If a fire happens and a lot of people are without homes, you HAVE to care about it and allow them to move into your property which you own." That clause doesn't exist nor should it. And not temporary either? So pitchforks and torches then? Just have the people rise up and TAKE the property then? Well that'll bode well for future investment in your country I am certain.


Now I'm not saying the Government couldn't try to make it worth the property owners' while to house those folks, but I'm sure you already are of the mindset that those "Evil rich people" are too rich as it is.



Property rights mean something