Is it that difficult to understand that being a good boxer has nothing to do with size?
Your original statement was that "the best boxers in the world are the bigger boxers."
We've already shown you instances where that's simply not true.
Skill is skill. Size is size. One is independent of the other.
Leonard was one of the best boxers in history. Better than probably most if not all of the heavyweights in history.
Yet he wouldn't stand a chance in the ring against a decent heavyweight, even one who's not a good boxer.
I'm puzzled as to what the confusion still is.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks