Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 1
Likes: 3
Dislikes: 1
Old Guard's cutman
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
Banned
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
dude did you even watch his statement about it? I CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE HATRED AND BIGOTRY AND RACISM OF WHAT THAT SICK MAN DID WHEN HE RAMMED HIS CAR AND KILLED THAT WONDERFUL YOUNG WOMAN. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR KKK OR NEO NAZIS OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. I CONDEMN AND REBUKE AND DISAVOW IT.Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
Super Moderator
Array
Maybe Trump needs to do the same.dude did you even watch his statement about it? I CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE HATRED AND BIGOTRY AND RACISM OF WHAT THAT SICK MAN DID WHEN HE RAMMED HIS CAR AND KILLED THAT WONDERFUL YOUNG WOMAN. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR KKK OR NEO NAZIS OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. I CONDEMN AND REBUKE AND DISAVOW IT.Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
Banned
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
DUDE, that WAS Trump's statementMaybe Trump needs to do the same.dude did you even watch his statement about it? I CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE HATRED AND BIGOTRY AND RACISM OF WHAT THAT SICK MAN DID WHEN HE RAMMED HIS CAR AND KILLED THAT WONDERFUL YOUNG WOMAN. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR KKK OR NEO NAZIS OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. I CONDEMN AND REBUKE AND DISAVOW IT.Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
Old Guard's cutman
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
I did read pretty much everything about him, about his statements and how it's reported (almost).dude did you even watch his statement about it? I CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE HATRED AND BIGOTRY AND RACISM OF WHAT THAT SICK MAN DID WHEN HE RAMMED HIS CAR AND KILLED THAT WONDERFUL YOUNG WOMAN. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR KKK OR NEO NAZIS OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. I CONDEMN AND REBUKE AND DISAVOW IT.Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
He never said that, he said that there was no place for racism and bigotry and he refused to talk directly against the KKK and other such organisations, just like he did refuse to do so during his very first days of presidency when some pointed out that these organisations did support him and as if he would agree to condemn them. He even tried to "defend them" with the "free speech right".
Here's the full 16 min, he NEVER opposite to what you assert, condemn them, je just said he was against neo nazis, that not every groups were neo-nazis (never condemn directly the KKK and such), starting to swirl saying that Lee was somehow a good man or not worst than Washington or Jefferson (which is pretty untrue) and continued to drift away without condemning the KKK or the pro-white militias. He wen to talk about jobs, never saying why in the first place, walking with nazis/KKK flags should not even be permitted as it talks in plain sight for discrimination.
Poor Americans who died from 1941 to 1945 to stop nazis, seeing some of their grandsons walking with such Flag in the land of the free with the eye of their very own President turninig a blind eye.
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
That's what I don't get. If you condem hatred and bigotry isn't that accross the board. Or is it necessary to do sub groups every time you condemn something. If I condem sexually transmitted diseases isn't that enough or do I have to mention each one or it doesn't count. Nazis and kkk are bigots, they are automatically included just as herpes would be in my protest against sexually transmitted disease. If I forgot one like chlamydia, does that mean I support it.I did read pretty much everything about him, about his statements and how it's reported (almost).dude did you even watch his statement about it? I CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE HATRED AND BIGOTRY AND RACISM OF WHAT THAT SICK MAN DID WHEN HE RAMMED HIS CAR AND KILLED THAT WONDERFUL YOUNG WOMAN. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR KKK OR NEO NAZIS OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. I CONDEMN AND REBUKE AND DISAVOW IT.Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
He never said that, he said that there was no place for racism and bigotry and he refused to talk directly against the KKK and other such organisations, just like he did refuse to do so during his very first days of presidency when some pointed out that these organisations did support him and as if he would agree to condemn them. He even tried to "defend them" with the "free speech right".
Here's the full 16 min, he NEVER opposite to what you assert, condemn them, je just said he was against neo nazis, that not every groups were neo-nazis (never condemn directly the KKK and such), starting to swirl saying that Lee was somehow a good man or not worst than Washington or Jefferson (which is pretty untrue) and continued to drift away without condemning the KKK or the pro-white militias. He wen to talk about jobs, never saying why in the first place, walking with nazis/KKK flags should not even be permitted as it talks in plain sight for discrimination.
Poor Americans who died from 1941 to 1945 to stop nazis, seeing some of their grandsons walking with such Flag in the land of the free with the eye of their very own President turninig a blind eye.
Banned
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
This is not a jab at nameless but I just don't get it either. I agree with walrus. He condemned hatred of every kind across the board he said KKK he said neo-nazis he said white supremacist he said white nationalist what the hell else does nameless or anybody else think that he needed to say. This is absolutely insane pedantry at the highest levels and I really think and again this is not a personal shot at nameless but I really think people have become so pedantic and uptight and sensitive that every single possible subgroup has to be mentioned otherwise it was a clear condoning in their eyes of some subgroup which was not properly mentioned in their own eyes. This is absolutely crazy and I think human beings have lost all sense of clarity of vision and the new Norm is to make absolute mountains out of molehills
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
I do think trumps battle with the media gets him hung up on one point to a degree that allows him to fall into the trap they set for him. Obama was very good at answering questions without answering them, Hillary was very good at that as well. It's something that would serve trump well
Banned
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
Old Guard's cutman
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
T's a pretty big deal when you shouldn't even let these people freely make hate talk in public and refuse to condemn such walk and saying that "the others are at fault, too". Plus, always refused to say that he doesn't want the support of the KKK when his campaign began and that these guys did support him.That's what I don't get. If you condem hatred and bigotry isn't that accross the board. Or is it necessary to do sub groups every time you condemn something. If I condem sexually transmitted diseases isn't that enough or do I have to mention each one or it doesn't count. Nazis and kkk are bigots, they are automatically included just as herpes would be in my protest against sexually transmitted disease. If I forgot one like chlamydia, does that mean I support it.I did read pretty much everything about him, about his statements and how it's reported (almost).dude did you even watch his statement about it? I CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE HATRED AND BIGOTRY AND RACISM OF WHAT THAT SICK MAN DID WHEN HE RAMMED HIS CAR AND KILLED THAT WONDERFUL YOUNG WOMAN. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR KKK OR NEO NAZIS OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. I CONDEMN AND REBUKE AND DISAVOW IT.Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
He never said that, he said that there was no place for racism and bigotry and he refused to talk directly against the KKK and other such organisations, just like he did refuse to do so during his very first days of presidency when some pointed out that these organisations did support him and as if he would agree to condemn them. He even tried to "defend them" with the "free speech right".
Here's the full 16 min, he NEVER opposite to what you assert, condemn them, je just said he was against neo nazis, that not every groups were neo-nazis (never condemn directly the KKK and such), starting to swirl saying that Lee was somehow a good man or not worst than Washington or Jefferson (which is pretty untrue) and continued to drift away without condemning the KKK or the pro-white militias. He wen to talk about jobs, never saying why in the first place, walking with nazis/KKK flags should not even be permitted as it talks in plain sight for discrimination.
Poor Americans who died from 1941 to 1945 to stop nazis, seeing some of their grandsons walking with such Flag in the land of the free with the eye of their very own President turninig a blind eye.
I
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
The extreme right who go nazi are such a small minority. Groups like antifa are part of the issue indeed. What is wrong with pointing out both sides are at faultT's a pretty big deal when you shouldn't even let these people freely make hate talk in public and refuse to condemn such walk and saying that "the others are at fault, too". Plus, always refused to say that he doesn't want the support of the KKK when his campaign began and that these guys did support him.That's what I don't get. If you condem hatred and bigotry isn't that accross the board. Or is it necessary to do sub groups every time you condemn something. If I condem sexually transmitted diseases isn't that enough or do I have to mention each one or it doesn't count. Nazis and kkk are bigots, they are automatically included just as herpes would be in my protest against sexually transmitted disease. If I forgot one like chlamydia, does that mean I support it.I did read pretty much everything about him, about his statements and how it's reported (almost).dude did you even watch his statement about it? I CONDEMN IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE TERMS THE HATRED AND BIGOTRY AND RACISM OF WHAT THAT SICK MAN DID WHEN HE RAMMED HIS CAR AND KILLED THAT WONDERFUL YOUNG WOMAN. THERE IS NO PLACE FOR KKK OR NEO NAZIS OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN OUR COUNTRY. I CONDEMN AND REBUKE AND DISAVOW IT.Well, he hardly did anything to convince us otherwise, he had an opportunity, a great opportunity, a reaalll great opportunity to show us otherwise though.
He never said that, he said that there was no place for racism and bigotry and he refused to talk directly against the KKK and other such organisations, just like he did refuse to do so during his very first days of presidency when some pointed out that these organisations did support him and as if he would agree to condemn them. He even tried to "defend them" with the "free speech right".
Here's the full 16 min, he NEVER opposite to what you assert, condemn them, je just said he was against neo nazis, that not every groups were neo-nazis (never condemn directly the KKK and such), starting to swirl saying that Lee was somehow a good man or not worst than Washington or Jefferson (which is pretty untrue) and continued to drift away without condemning the KKK or the pro-white militias. He wen to talk about jobs, never saying why in the first place, walking with nazis/KKK flags should not even be permitted as it talks in plain sight for discrimination.
Poor Americans who died from 1941 to 1945 to stop nazis, seeing some of their grandsons walking with such Flag in the land of the free with the eye of their very own President turninig a blind eye.
I
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Barcelona attack was by a "vehicle", but Charlottesville was by a "terrorist" (MS
We are having a serious problem in our country with censoring of conservative groups. The division is funded by George soros and his tribe. The media has been out to demonize trump since day one. Violent gangs are taking down our history. 67% of America want the statues to say. Much of the civil war was about state rights and good or bad it is our history. The Vietnam memorial was recently defaced by left wing fascist and yet gets little coverage
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks