Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Silkeyjoe View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Primo Carnera View Post
Chisora was shit, is shit, always will be shit. Cunningham had been a WORLD Champion, let's give him some respect. The reason he looked good against Chisora and not so good against Cunningham is because Chisora isn't good enough to make it awkward for Fury, whereas Cunningham is a better boxer and gave Fury more to think about. Simple as that really.
I dont know. If the Cunningham Fury faced took on Chisora Id fancy Chisora to win. Chisora is shit but he gave Pulev a good go and took Whyte in a close fight. Think Whyte is the only heavy in the top 10 of all orgs at the moment. I think Whyte is awful also but he genuinely probably is top 10 at the moment. Shows the state of heavyweight boxing
Mate, the best Cunningham would beat the best Chisora. How can I be so sure? Because EVERY DECENT FIGHTER has beaten Chisora. He has NEVER beat a good fighter in his whole career.
His best ever win was Malik Scott. And that was cos Scott mistimed the count, and Scott was pissing the fight.
I am absolutely fucking amazed that he made so much of a career out of being shite!
It's not good enough saying "he looked good against Whyte, he looked good against Vitali." He fucking lost.
But best Cunningham is at Cruiser. At heavy he has beaten noone. Cunningham, like Chisora, has only really lost to good opposition. No doubt cunningham is the better fighter but size is so important in boxing which is always underestimated.