Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  6
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Tyson-Douglas: Slow count?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    In my own little Universe
    Posts
    10,052
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2261
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson-Douglas: Slow count?

    I am a massive Tyson fan, but the bloke was a self-loathing nutjob with serious addictive tendencies.

    If boxing (and Cus D'Amato) hadn't found him, it's very likely he would have been dead or serving a life sentence by 20 instead of being the youngest and most destructive heavyweight champ in history.

    Looking back, I suspect that his peak was always going to be short and meteoric. The truth is that by the time he fought Douglas, he was pretty much finished as an elite boxer. He wasn't training properly and was leading an incredibly destructive lifestyle.

    The so called long count was completely irrelevant in this fight. Douglas was superb and was completely dominating the fight. Tyson reached back into his past to produce the knockdown, but Buster was fully compos mentis and I think Tyson was too tired to finish him off at that point. Douglas would have just got up and continued to punish Tyson.
    If God wanted us to be vegetarians, why are animals made of meat ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Leeds, UK
    Posts
    9,172
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1870
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Tyson-Douglas: Slow count?

    Quote Originally Posted by X View Post
    I am a massive Tyson fan, but the bloke was a self-loathing nutjob with serious addictive tendencies.

    If boxing (and Cus D'Amato) hadn't found him, it's very likely he would have been dead or serving a life sentence by 20 instead of being the youngest and most destructive heavyweight champ in history.

    Looking back, I suspect that his peak was always going to be short and meteoric. The truth is that by the time he fought Douglas, he was pretty much finished as an elite boxer. He wasn't training properly and was leading an incredibly destructive lifestyle.

    The so called long count was completely irrelevant in this fight. Douglas was superb and was completely dominating the fight. Tyson reached back into his past to produce the knockdown, but Buster was fully compos mentis and I think Tyson was too tired to finish him off at that point. Douglas would have just got up and continued to punish Tyson.
    agree with all that - good points
    Don't bully fat kids - they've got enough on their plate

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tyson Vs Douglas- Myth of the long count debunked
    By generalbulldog in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-27-2010, 02:09 AM
  2. Anybody got the Tyson Douglas fight?
    By porkypara in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-05-2010, 09:11 PM
  3. What if Tyson and Douglas had a rematch?
    By Majesty in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 03-01-2010, 03:24 PM
  4. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 12-15-2007, 04:42 AM
  5. Tyson-Douglas
    By USA LOVES THE KLITSCHKOS in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-17-2007, 02:56 AM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing