Who is lying?

[powerpuncher]

People are constantly overrating the HWs. I could buy into the fact that AJ had better competition than Wilder, but Parker and Whyte aren’t really much better than Stiverne and Arreola. None of them are good anyways.

[Fenster]

Parker and Whyte are prime guys with ambition, something Wilder and Fury have been kept away from.

Fury and Wilder really haven't proved they're much in front of the pack, they both have one good win which props them up, but overall their records are very weak.

Of the current top 10 heavyweights (The Ring) Fury has fought ZERO and Wilder ONE!

I'm not certain they beat any of a dozen heavyweights let alone AJ. And likewise he's not certain to beat Povetkin and a few others.

[powerpuncher]

Parker and Whyte are prime guys with ambition, something Wilder and Fury have been kept away from.

Fury and Wilder really haven't proved they're much in front of the pack, they both have one good win which props them up, but overall their records are very weak.

Of the current top 10 heavyweights (The Ring) Fury has fought ZERO and Wilder ONE!

I'm not certain they beat any of a dozen heavyweights let alone AJ. And likewise he's not certain to beat Povetkin and a few others.

I don’t necessarily disagree, but I feel the same about AJ. None of the three do I feel super confident that they beat any other top HW. I still think Wilder beats AJ but I’m not that confident. If AJ proves me wrong then so be it. I feel like all three need to do quite a bit more to prove they’re at that next level and not just a good fighter among at best average HWs

[Fenster]

That's basically what i'm saying.

The winner of Wilder-AJ-Fury would clearly be the standout king of the heavyweights but there's so much more for these guys to prove yet. These are young guys in their prime, with constant new challengers emerging, not old guys who have proved it all already.

One good win doesn't make you a great.