Saunders v Andrade - Boston 20/10/18 - Sky/DAZN - CANCELLED

[Fenster]

I told you all Murata was basic and it was a BS fight for GGG to look at. He needs to fight someone talented

Shame you didn't tell us the underdog (Brant) would pull an obvious upset, we would have all been minted. The bookies thought the fight was much more competitive than "boxrec experts."

Juergen Braehmer schooled Brant, he would be a talented guy for Golovkin. Agree?

Yea those cards were way to wide. Brant won but it was closer. I had it 116-112.

Murata was so 'basic' he was a 6-1 favorite. Brant is a good fighter and set a tremendous pace. Murata fought 1 dimensionally, just trying to land his big right hand. Upsets happen, no one here saw this coming, or if they did, never posted about it.

He fought one dimensional but he wasn’t basic? Is that the argument?

Because I was quite clear before the fight just how basic he is. One dimensional sounds like basic to me.

Styles make fights, didn't hear you say anything about Brant winning. I haven't seen Murata fight that badly before. He was just loading that right.

I’ve never seen Brant fight, I wouldn’t make a prediction on him. I don’t make many predictions on fights at all actually. I more point to abilities and weaknesses. Like GGG having fantastic punch selection but the drawback of tipping his punches. If his left elbow is tight he’s looking down the middle 1-2, if it flairs a few inches he’s going to come around with the hook. These types of things can be used for others more arrogant to predict fights. I just speak on talent and on my obnoxious desire to see great fighters take good fights against talented fighters. And then I read the insults of me for daring to ask fighters to fight hahaha

I told you all Murata was basic and it was a BS fight for GGG to look at. He needs to fight someone talented

This is the problem, Ron. It sticks out like a sore thumb when fans speak about fighters they know nothing about.

It was Murata I called basic, you called top 5. Who knows nothing about Murata? Get something right before you come at me. Just one thing right. I’ll enjoy the silence.

Come at you? You're running around gloating about being proven right about something you didn't even predict whilst accusing anyone who said Murata made viable sense for Golovkin of being a fool (you quoted me).

Rankings change every single week, they are constantly evolving, that's the whole point. You don't get to pick and choose your favourite fighters.

Charlo hasn't done shit at 160. Fact. He doesn't "deserve" special treatment just because he's Ron's favourite guy.

[Ron Swanson]

I told you all Murata was basic and it was a BS fight for GGG to look at. He needs to fight someone talented

Shame you didn't tell us the underdog (Brant) would pull an obvious upset, we would have all been minted. The bookies thought the fight was much more competitive than "boxrec experts."

Juergen Braehmer schooled Brant, he would be a talented guy for Golovkin. Agree?

Yea those cards were way to wide. Brant won but it was closer. I had it 116-112.

Murata was so 'basic' he was a 6-1 favorite. Brant is a good fighter and set a tremendous pace. Murata fought 1 dimensionally, just trying to land his big right hand. Upsets happen, no one here saw this coming, or if they did, never posted about it.

He fought one dimensional but he wasn’t basic? Is that the argument?

Because I was quite clear before the fight just how basic he is. One dimensional sounds like basic to me.

Styles make fights, didn't hear you say anything about Brant winning. I haven't seen Murata fight that badly before. He was just loading that right.

I’ve never seen Brant fight, I wouldn’t make a prediction on him. I don’t make many predictions on fights at all actually. I more point to abilities and weaknesses. Like GGG having fantastic punch selection but the drawback of tipping his punches. If his left elbow is tight he’s looking down the middle 1-2, if it flairs a few inches he’s going to come around with the hook. These types of things can be used for others more arrogant to predict fights. I just speak on talent and on my obnoxious desire to see great fighters take good fights against talented fighters. And then I read the insults of me for daring to ask fighters to fight hahaha

I told you all Murata was basic and it was a BS fight for GGG to look at. He needs to fight someone talented

This is the problem, Ron. It sticks out like a sore thumb when fans speak about fighters they know nothing about.

It was Murata I called basic, you called top 5. Who knows nothing about Murata? Get something right before you come at me. Just one thing right. I’ll enjoy the silence.

Come at you? You're running around gloating about being proven right about something you didn't even predict whilst accusing anyone who said Murata made viable sense for Golovkin of being a fool (you quoted me).

Rankings change every single week, they are constantly evolving, that's the whole point. You don't get to pick and choose your favourite fighters.

Charlo hasn't done shit at 160. Fact. He doesn't "deserve" special treatment just because he's Ron's favourite guy.

You can’t get a single thing right. So you paint a picture over the truth to fit your narratives. You said Murata was top 5, own it. I said he was basic. You say Charlo is my guy, again completely wrong. As others will probably remember and you can go back to the rankings thread to see it yourself. I don’t know if Charlo is number 1 or number 7. I want the Charlo fight not because I am a fan as your attempt to build a narrative would suggest. But because I want to know how good Charlo is. He is clearly more talented than Murata so it interests me more. But he might get hit in the mouth and become a mouse. That’s why I want the fight. To see who is the best of the most talented fighters. Stop trying to tear me down with incorrect assertions and argue a point. It’s a very troll technique. You said yourself you think Charlo would beat Murata, then how did you rate Murata top 5? It’s you that is inconsistent. Check my history, I only ask for top guys to fight top guys, completely consistent. Whether I like them or not. All I want is answers about who is the best and to see it unfold. You are the one that lets use rankings here, they don’t count here, here, not here. I am all eye test and fights. And if you check my record my eye for talent is pretty f’n good. I admit when I’m wrong about guys. And I give credit for performance whether I like the guy or not.

[palmerq]

Ron Swanson is like a demented terrier. .. excellent work....


I was quite drunk last night, building a weird tortoise shed with an asian roof, started drinking way too early, Andrade seemed pretty good but the other guy just didn't look good at all.. I could be well wrong though...not sure if hed beat Saunders, he seems to crouch a bit and give up his height advantage. .. I realty hope he does beat Saunders though... can't stand that guy...

[p4pking]

Ron Swanson is like a demented terrier. .. excellent work....


I was quite drunk last night, building a weird tortoise shed with an asian roof, started drinking way too early, Andrade seemed pretty good but the other guy just didn't look good at all.. I could be well wrong though...not sure if hed beat Saunders, he seems to crouch a bit and give up his height advantage. .. I realty hope he does beat Saunders though... can't stand that guy...

No shame in that, when I start drinking too early I haul my weird tortoise out of his shed and scream at him to build a dog house with a Roof made of Swansons hungry man dinners. It’s a good thing he can’t build a real terrier, as that dog would be soaking wet all day, which could only add to his dementia.