God Bless London

[Master]

Yes, more foreign taxi drivers, kebab shops and Sharia courts then. It is more diverse to invite in polygamy too, but it is more practical to bring in skilled efficient people who will actually add to an economy. If you do not have a skill then why would anyone want you? It is not creepy, it is practical.

Nobody is stopping the left from moving elsewhere to satiate their need for diversity. They can go to Bangladesh if they want, why turn London into Pakistan instead?

In fact where 70% of the populace wants far less immigration, not more, then why bring in anyone more at all? The public have had their fill of diversity.

You are very offensive in your post.

[Beanz]

Yes, more foreign taxi drivers, kebab shops and Sharia courts then. It is more diverse to invite in polygamy too, but it is more practical to bring in skilled efficient people who will actually add to an economy. If you do not have a skill then why would anyone want you? It is not creepy, it is practical.

Nobody is stopping the left from moving elsewhere to satiate their need for diversity. They can go to Bangladesh if they want, why turn London into Pakistan instead?

In fact where 70% of the populace wants far less immigration, not more, then why bring in anyone more at all? The public have had their fill of diversity.

You are very offensive in your post.

He has always been a racist. He revels in it as though it is some kind of achievement. Many white racists move to homogenous societies in places like South Korea in order to preserve their delusional fantasies of a white Britain.

[Gandalf]

Yes, more foreign taxi drivers, kebab shops and Sharia courts then. It is more diverse to invite in polygamy too, but it is more practical to bring in skilled efficient people who will actually add to an economy. If you do not have a skill then why would anyone want you? It is not creepy, it is practical.

Nobody is stopping the left from moving elsewhere to satiate their need for diversity. They can go to Bangladesh if they want, why turn London into Pakistan instead?

In fact where 70% of the populace wants far less immigration, not more, then why bring in anyone more at all? The public have had their fill of diversity.

You are very offensive in your post.

He has always been a racist. He revels in it as though it is some kind of achievement. Many white racists move to homogenous societies in places like South Korea in order to preserve their delusional fantasies of a white Britain.

Do you have the data on that? I do have the data on what British people think on migration and you and Master are a tiny minority. Are the 70 odd percent who think it has gone too far racist too? I am surprised you do not flee to Pakistan to escape the horror of racist Britain.

It is not racist to say that British culture is under threat and that the party you two support wants more of it. A projected 3 million more in the next decade and 80% of kids born to migrants already.

It is an unnatural experiment.

[Gandalf]

Correction: Including kids population increase is 84% driven by migration. I got carried away.

[Fatboxingfan]

So then why don't the whites have kids? In 25 years whites, Korean and Japanese will be gone, they aren't having babies, they're done, obsolete, extinct, something is terrible wrong with their cuckish NEGATIVE BIRTH RATES, so don't complaining if replanish population via immigration!

[Gandalf]

So then why don't the whites have kids? In 25 years whites, Korean and Japanese will be gone, they aren't having babies, they're done, obsolete, extinct, something is terrible wrong with their cuckish NEGATIVE BIRTH RATES, so don't complaining if replanish population via immigration!

There is no net benefit to migration. It is a burden on a country fiscally. Birthrates mean little in a mechanised age which the next few years will see eliminated many of the low skilled jobs people took for granted. Inequality will inevitably rise and then you potentially have something dangerous. Without mass immigration that can be subdued. It is not good for a developed country to do this in a technological age.

[Gandalf]

I always do data. It costs a lot of money and will result in further welfare issues in a technological age.

https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/what-is-the-problem

[Fatboxingfan]

So then why don't the whites have kids? In 25 years whites, Korean and Japanese will be gone, they aren't having babies, they're done, obsolete, extinct, something is terrible wrong with their cuckish NEGATIVE BIRTH RATES, so don't complaining if replanish population via immigration!

There is no net benefit to migration. It is a burden on a country fiscally. Birthrates mean little in a mechanised age which the next few years will see eliminated many of the low skilled jobs people took for granted. Inequality will inevitably rise and then you potentially have something dangerous. Without mass immigration that can be subdued. It is not good for a developed country to do this in a technological age.

No offense but it sounds like you're getting these opinions from textbooks and from academics who have no experience in real life

[Gandalf]

Yes, more foreign taxi drivers, kebab shops and Sharia courts then. It is more diverse to invite in polygamy too, but it is more practical to bring in skilled efficient people who will actually add to an economy. If you do not have a skill then why would anyone want you? It is not creepy, it is practical.

Nobody is stopping the left from moving elsewhere to satiate their need for diversity. They can go to Bangladesh if they want, why turn London into Pakistan instead?

In fact where 70% of the populace wants far less immigration, not more, then why bring in anyone more at all? The public have had their fill of diversity.

You are very offensive in your post.

And it is not offensive to turn London into a foreign city when 70% of the populace wants immigration to slow or stop? What about their feelings? That is what concerns me more.

I have never argued against sensible immigration that considers the interests of the local populace.

The policy is offensive to British people. Look at any poll. They are against it.