Impeachment

[El Kabong]

Sure why not. Make it happen Kirk

In that case Obama was legally justified in investigating Trump. They can stop the investigation into the investigators, they were all acting legally with presidential authority.

Well go take that to DC, try it out, see how it works for you.

If Trump is allowed to investigate people he thinks are corrupt then surely Obama is too?

Sure thing Kirk, go for it.

[walrus]

Sure why not. Make it happen Kirk

In that case Obama was legally justified in investigating Trump. They can stop the investigation into the investigators, they were all acting legally with presidential authority.

Well go take that to DC, try it out, see how it works for you.

If Trump is allowed to investigate people he thinks are corrupt then surely Obama is too?

Sure thing Kirk, go for it.

Did Kirk ever address that trump is not a Russian agent? Or like the typical trump hater did he just move on to this go nowhere impeachment like everyone else.

[El Kabong]

Did Kirk ever address that trump is not a Russian agent? Or like the typical trump hater did he just move on to this go nowhere impeachment like everyone else.

Not sure. I believe TDS is typically accompanied by ADHD so perhaps that.....fell off his little shelf

[walrus]

Romney’s holier than thou speech would have more effect if he wasn’t a never trumper from the beginning.

[El Kabong]

Romney’s holier than thou speech would have more effect if he wasn’t a never trumper from the beginning.

Funny to see the typical lefties in the media all heap praise on him when not all that long ago they slammed him for having "binders of women"....whom he had intended to interview and hire for positions in his cabinet, but that's besides the point.

[walrus]

Romney’s holier than thou speech would have more effect if he wasn’t a never trumper from the beginning.

Funny to see the typical lefties in the media all heap praise on him when not all that long ago they slammed him for having "binders of women"....whom he had intended to interview and hire for positions in his cabinet, but that's besides the point.

Of course not now he is a saint, I think literally according to the Book of Mormon

[Kirkland Laing]

Sure why not. Make it happen Kirk

In that case Obama was legally justified in investigating Trump. They can stop the investigation into the investigators, they were all acting legally with presidential authority.

Well go take that to DC, try it out, see how it works for you.

If Trump is allowed to investigate people he thinks are corrupt then surely Obama is too?

Sure thing Kirk, go for it.

Did Kirk ever address that trump is not a Russian agent? Or like the typical trump hater did he just move on to this go nowhere impeachment like everyone else.

Yes, this has been explained to you more than once. There is endless evidence to show the Trump campaign and Russia working together. You can read (hahahahahahahahaha) the first eleven pages of the Mueller report for all the details. Mueller couldn't prove it beyond reasonable doubt however due to various Trump people refusing to give evidence, destroying evidence, taking the fifth and so on.

[El Kabong]

Yes, this has been explained to you more than once. There is endless evidence to show the Trump campaign and Russia working together. You can read (hahahahahahahahaha) the first eleven pages of the Mueller report for all the details. Mueller couldn't prove it beyond reasonable doubt however due to various Trump people refusing to give evidence, destroying evidence, taking the fifth and so on.

Thank you for finally admitting you were wrong and I did not lose that bet.

[Kirkland Laing]

Yes, this has been explained to you more than once. There is endless evidence to show the Trump campaign and Russia working together. You can read (hahahahahahahahaha) the first eleven pages of the Mueller report for all the details. Mueller couldn't prove it beyond reasonable doubt however due to various Trump people refusing to give evidence, destroying evidence, taking the fifth and so on.

Thank you for finally admitting you were wrong and I did not lose that bet.

The bet wasn't that Mueller couldn't indict Trump for conspiring with Russia. The bet is whether Russia hacked the DNC servers. And you've just confirmed that you lost the bet. If Mueller not having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that what you thought the bet was over -- Trump conspiring with the Russians -- was true means that I lost the bet then Mueller having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Russians hacked the DNC servers -- which he does -- means that by your own metric I won the bet. You can now finally pay the money you owe to those two find organisations. $50 each and a further $40 split when Flynn is sentenced soon.

[Kirkland Laing]

If you bet at least $100 I'll give you 10000 to 1 odds that I'm right and you're wrong and the Mueller report proves all the emails were hacked by Russia. And I'll pay the money directly to you. You can make a million dollars by betting a hundred if you really believe the Seth Rich thing.



http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...87#post1517087

[El Kabong]

So we agree that if Trump can order investigations into people Trump thinks are corrupt then so could Obama when he was president?

I'd ask about if the investigations were properly predicated, but then you'll squeal about it so I'm just going to let it play out. FBI Director Wray addressed the house today and referenced FISA abuse...so we'll see what happens there.

The bet wasn't that Mueller couldn't indict Trump for conspiring with Russia. The bet is whether Russia hacked the DNC servers. And you've just confirmed that you lost the bet. If Mueller not having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that what you thought the bet was over -- Trump conspiring with the Russians -- was true means that I lost the bet then Mueller having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Russians hacked the DNC servers -- which he does -- means that by your own metric I won the bet. You can now finally pay the money you owe to those two find organisations. $50 each and a further $40 split when Flynn is sentenced soon.

The FBI never had the servers they had what CROWDSTRIKE gave them....not like they'd give a fair shake anyway. But yeah this is why you lost the bet.

If you bet at least $100 I'll give you 10000 to 1 odds that I'm right and you're wrong and the Mueller report proves all the emails were hacked by Russia. And I'll pay the money directly to you. You can make a million dollars by betting a hundred if you really believe the Seth Rich thing.

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...87#post1517087

Yeah, I'm well aware and THE guy who ran WikiLeaks at that time said he had 0, nil, nada, nothing, come from Russia or Russian assets. So when he testifies OR the actual server is produced, then and only then will the case be 100% settled. Sorry if you're disappointed by that.

[Kirkland Laing]

Yes, this has been explained to you more than once. There is endless evidence to show the Trump campaign and Russia working together. You can read (hahahahahahahahaha) the first eleven pages of the Mueller report for all the details. Mueller couldn't prove it beyond reasonable doubt however due to various Trump people refusing to give evidence, destroying evidence, taking the fifth and so on.

Thank you for finally admitting you were wrong and I did not lose that bet.

If Mueller couldn't prove something beyond reasonable doubt means I lost the bet then by your own determinant if Mueller could prove it beyond reasonable doubt then I win the bet. And Mueller has proof beyond reasonable doubt that the Russians hacked the DNC. So pay up.

[Kirkland Laing]

Oh and well done Mitt Romney. I would say history will be very kind to you for what you did but it depends who ends up writing the history books, doesn't it. Not looking too clever on that front recently.

[El Kabong]

If Mueller couldn't prove something beyond reasonable doubt means I lost the bet then by your own determinant if Mueller could prove it beyond reasonable doubt then I win the bet. And Mueller has proof beyond reasonable doubt that the Russians hacked the DNC. So pay up.

you said and I quote "hacked all the emails" keyword there being ALL as in 100%....did he prove that? No, no he didn't. Thank you very much.

Oh and well done Mitt Romney. I would say history will be very kind to you for what you did but it depends who ends up writing the history books, doesn't it. Not looking too clever on that front recently.

Yes it's quite bipolar recently in 2012 Mitt was giving people cancer and stuffing women in binders and now he's a REEEEEEEEEsistance hero

[walrus]

Sure why not. Make it happen Kirk

In that case Obama was legally justified in investigating Trump. They can stop the investigation into the investigators, they were all acting legally with presidential authority.

Well go take that to DC, try it out, see how it works for you.

If Trump is allowed to investigate people he thinks are corrupt then surely Obama is too?

Sure thing Kirk, go for it.

Did Kirk ever address that trump is not a Russian agent? Or like the typical trump hater did he just move on to this go nowhere impeachment like everyone else.

Yes, this has been explained to you more than once. There is endless evidence to show the Trump campaign and Russia working together. You can read (hahahahahahahahaha) the first eleven pages of the Mueller report for all the details. Mueller couldn't prove it beyond reasonable doubt however due to various Trump people refusing to give evidence, destroying evidence, taking the fifth and so on.

So you believe trump is a Russian asset ? A secret agent?