Impeachment

[Kirkland Laing]

Yes, this has been explained to you more than once. There is endless evidence to show the Trump campaign and Russia working together. You can read (hahahahahahahahaha) the first eleven pages of the Mueller report for all the details. Mueller couldn't prove it beyond reasonable doubt however due to various Trump people refusing to give evidence, destroying evidence, taking the fifth and so on.

Thank you for finally admitting you were wrong and I did not lose that bet.

The bet wasn't that Mueller couldn't indict Trump for conspiring with Russia. The bet is whether Russia hacked the DNC servers. And you've just confirmed that you lost the bet. If Mueller not having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that what you thought the bet was over -- Trump conspiring with the Russians -- was true means that I lost the bet then Mueller having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Russians hacked the DNC servers -- which he does -- means that by your own metric I won the bet. You can now finally pay the money you owe to those two find organisations. $50 each and a further $40 split when Flynn is sentenced soon.

[Kirkland Laing]

If you bet at least $100 I'll give you 10000 to 1 odds that I'm right and you're wrong and the Mueller report proves all the emails were hacked by Russia. And I'll pay the money directly to you. You can make a million dollars by betting a hundred if you really believe the Seth Rich thing.



http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...87#post1517087

[El Kabong]

So we agree that if Trump can order investigations into people Trump thinks are corrupt then so could Obama when he was president?

I'd ask about if the investigations were properly predicated, but then you'll squeal about it so I'm just going to let it play out. FBI Director Wray addressed the house today and referenced FISA abuse...so we'll see what happens there.

The bet wasn't that Mueller couldn't indict Trump for conspiring with Russia. The bet is whether Russia hacked the DNC servers. And you've just confirmed that you lost the bet. If Mueller not having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that what you thought the bet was over -- Trump conspiring with the Russians -- was true means that I lost the bet then Mueller having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Russians hacked the DNC servers -- which he does -- means that by your own metric I won the bet. You can now finally pay the money you owe to those two find organisations. $50 each and a further $40 split when Flynn is sentenced soon.

The FBI never had the servers they had what CROWDSTRIKE gave them....not like they'd give a fair shake anyway. But yeah this is why you lost the bet.

If you bet at least $100 I'll give you 10000 to 1 odds that I'm right and you're wrong and the Mueller report proves all the emails were hacked by Russia. And I'll pay the money directly to you. You can make a million dollars by betting a hundred if you really believe the Seth Rich thing.

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...87#post1517087

Yeah, I'm well aware and THE guy who ran WikiLeaks at that time said he had 0, nil, nada, nothing, come from Russia or Russian assets. So when he testifies OR the actual server is produced, then and only then will the case be 100% settled. Sorry if you're disappointed by that.

[Kirkland Laing]

So we agree that if Trump can order investigations into people Trump thinks are corrupt then so could Obama when he was president?

I'd ask about if the investigations were properly predicated, but then you'll squeal about it so I'm just going to let it play out. FBI Director Wray addressed the house today and referenced FISA abuse...so we'll see what happens there.

The bet wasn't that Mueller couldn't indict Trump for conspiring with Russia. The bet is whether Russia hacked the DNC servers. And you've just confirmed that you lost the bet. If Mueller not having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that what you thought the bet was over -- Trump conspiring with the Russians -- was true means that I lost the bet then Mueller having evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Russians hacked the DNC servers -- which he does -- means that by your own metric I won the bet. You can now finally pay the money you owe to those two find organisations. $50 each and a further $40 split when Flynn is sentenced soon.

The FBI never had the servers they had what CROWDSTRIKE gave them....not like they'd give a fair shake anyway. But yeah this is why you lost the bet.

If you bet at least $100 I'll give you 10000 to 1 odds that I'm right and you're wrong and the Mueller report proves all the emails were hacked by Russia. And I'll pay the money directly to you. You can make a million dollars by betting a hundred if you really believe the Seth Rich thing.

http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...87#post1517087

Yeah, I'm well aware and THE guy who ran WikiLeaks at that time said he had 0, nil, nada, nothing, come from Russia or Russian assets. So when he testifies OR the actual server is produced, then and only then will the case be 100% settled. Sorry if you're disappointed by that.

By your own metric you lost the bet. And once again, there was never a single server. There were dozens of servers, most of them in huge cloud systems. It would be impossible to physically remove the servers. The FBI were given a mirror of the whole system which is impossible to alter without being obvious to investigators. Of course the FBI are all corrupt as well aren't they. Anyway, I offered you a bet knowing your "intensive research" into this was watching Q videos on youtube and that you wouldn't have even read the four page summary of the Mueller report that the DOJ sent out. Which is why I felt secure in offering you a thousand to one odds knowing what I was betting on had just been confirmed by the Trump DOJ. Idiot.

[El Kabong]

Keep singing that same old song Kirkland and I'll keep telling you the same as I always have.