well i think that Quintana is technically the better BOXER out of the two, just Cotto has the gift to be able to impose his will on you
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
well i think that Quintana is technically the better BOXER out of the two, just Cotto has the gift to be able to impose his will on you
Quintana is the slicker boxer, but he's not a better technical boxer. Cotto has better classic boxing technique than Quintana. Quintana is slick, smart, and has a bit of an awkward style. People often mistake slick style boxers for having better technique than guys who come straight at you. Cotto is an excellent technical boxer.
Actually, I re-watched that Cotto-Quintana fight after the Williams fight. And I have to say that Quintana was basically outboxing and landing some good shots on Cotto for four rounds but then Cotto got to his body and he quit on his stool. Quintana is a great boxer but his lack of stamina and maybe his lack of heart is his downfall.
Array
Im certainly agree with you and if we see again the P.W.vs C.Q. fight you will see that Quintana tried fight Cotto as the same strategie with a lot of movement at side to side, etc. , but the only difference that he came in agressive in the first of 4 and 5 round and took the lead of the fight. After all for me Quintana dont have nothing to get with Cotto , just a Big Purse in one fight.........
![]()
Array
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks