OK England....that's enough!

[El Kabong]

No he didn't, he gave aid to a group which almost certainly contained a few AQ people. And it was official government policy carried out in the open and supported by Republicans.

You were trying to make the case that the US is rarely involved in wars when your foreign policy causes all this shit.

So America should just sit back and do nothing then? That would make everyone happy

It doesn't matter what America does in all honesty, we're the super power, we're expected to get involved in other countries.....it's not OUR fault some people get a little carried away with what our support means all we are trying to do is look after our own intrests.


The Republicans were against "nation building" (apparently only in the Balkans) and therefore thought we should stay out of Bosnia and Kosovo altogether.....the Republicans aren't always FOR war and the Democrats aren't always AGAINST war. Sure this was probably grandstanding against Clinton but hey they were correct.

[Kirkland Laing]

No he didn't, he gave aid to a group which almost certainly contained a few AQ people. And it was official government policy carried out in the open and supported by Republicans.

You were trying to make the case that the US is rarely involved in wars when your foreign policy causes all this shit.

So America should just sit back and do nothing then? That would make everyone happy

It doesn't matter what America does in all honesty, we're the super power, we're expected to get involved in other countries.....it's not OUR fault some people get a little carried away with what our support means all we are trying to do is look after our own intrests.


The Republicans were against "nation building" (apparently only in the Balkans) and therefore thought we should stay out of Bosnia and Kosovo altogether.....the Republicans aren't always FOR war and the Democrats aren't always AGAINST war. Sure this was probably grandstanding against Clinton but hey they were correct.

It depends what you mean by "get involved", doesn't it? If "getting involved" means bombing another country to buggery and invading with hundreds of thousands of troops then I'm guessing that most countries would offer a violent reaction to that sort of "involvement." Especially, say, a country that contains the second-largest oil reserve in a region that's seen a century of imperial invasions and manipulations due to their oil reserves. Those people might not see that kind of "involvement" as "supportive."

Perhaps you could develop interests not related to oil and fancy weapons systems. Maybe then you wouldn't invite such violent reactions ?

[El Kabong]

It depends what you mean by "get involved", doesn't it? If "getting involved" means bombing another country to buggery and invading with hundreds of thousands of troops then I'm guessing that most countries would offer a violent reaction to that sort of "involvement." Especially, say, a country that contains the second-largest oil reserve in a region that's seen a century of imperial invasions and manipulations due to their oil reserves. Those people might not see that kind of "involvement" as "supportive."

Perhaps you could develop interests not related to oil and fancy weapons systems. Maybe then you wouldn't invite such violent reactions ?

Well we're glad you have an opinion England....we'll keep that in mind

[Kirkland Laing]

It depends what you mean by "get involved", doesn't it? If "getting involved" means bombing another country to buggery and invading with hundreds of thousands of troops then I'm guessing that most countries would offer a violent reaction to that sort of "involvement." Especially, say, a country that contains the second-largest oil reserve in a region that's seen a century of imperial invasions and manipulations due to their oil reserves. Those people might not see that kind of "involvement" as "supportive."

Perhaps you could develop interests not related to oil and fancy weapons systems. Maybe then you wouldn't invite such violent reactions ?

Well we're glad you have an opinion England....we'll keep that in mind

I'm sure that most Americans would agree that bombing other countries to buggery is unlikely to bring about world peace.

[El Kabong]

.....not if you bomb them good enough

[Kirkland Laing]

.....not if you bomb them good enough

They should just flatten Iraq and build a giant Disneyworld on it then bomb Mecca. That would solve the problem.

[Kev]

.....not if you bomb them good enough

They should just flatten Iraq and build a giant Disneyworld on it then bomb Mecca. That would solve the problem.

Don't be so fucking offensive!!!




































They need to bomb Mecca BEFORE they build a disneyland else civilians could be harmed!