Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Why I hate the P4P rankings

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Why I hate the P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    That may be why it was created but its certainly not that any more, at least not the All Time p4p chart.

    You're beginning to whine more than me, and that's not easy to do.
    I'm not whining I'm merely explaining the flaws in your logic.


    Pound 4 Pound means the best fighting ability, skill, and record in the smallest package and therefore ranking Ali in ANY pound for pound list is idiotic because HE WAS THE BIGGEST FIGHTER OF HIS ERA!!!! I don't know if I can stress that enough

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3381
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why I hate the P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    That may be why it was created but its certainly not that any more, at least not the All Time p4p chart.

    You're beginning to whine more than me, and that's not easy to do.
    I'm not whining I'm merely explaining the flaws in your logic.


    Pound 4 Pound means the best fighting ability, skill, and record in the smallest package and therefore ranking Ali in ANY pound for pound list is idiotic because HE WAS THE BIGGEST FIGHTER OF HIS ERA!!!! I don't know if I can stress that enough
    That's exactly what I said too

    I don't think p4p means that at all, not any more at any rate.

    My own definition of p4p would be

    A determination of a fighter's ability and boxing prowess irrespective of his size.

    Let me ask you this. If the best fighter in the world, as in most dominant, most eye catching, quickest, slickest boxer was a heavyweight should he be omitted from the p4p list almost as if he doesn't exist because he's a heavyweight?

    This wouldn't be a problem if the heavyweight champ was introduced as the 'best fighter in the world' but I've never heard that.

    However Floyd always get acknowledeged as the universally recognised p4p best fighter in the world today whenever he fights.

    Personally I think if the best fighter in the world happened to be a heavyweight, then he should get that title.

    Ultimately I agree with you regarding the origin of the p4p term, but who cares?

    Back then when it was invented we had 15 round fights, maybe longer, only 8 weight classes and not nearly as much television coverage.

    Back then the heavyweights were the glamour division.

    Nowadays the spotlight has completely shifted into the lower divisions. In fact its now the heavyweights that need recognition over the welter and feather weight fighters!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. BRAND NEW UK RANKINGS
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-18-2007, 04:42 PM
  2. *UK RANKINGS*
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-05-2007, 01:16 AM
  3. wbc rankings
    By dezmundo1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 11:51 PM
  4. How would you set-up the rankings?
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-29-2007, 06:09 PM
  5. Current HW Rankings
    By The Shadow in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-11-2007, 03:17 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing