Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
Quote Originally Posted by sonny78 View Post
And there's me thinking stoppage wins over TSzyu and Castillo were slightly better then a win over Vivian Harris.
I agree

Hatton's loss was at 147 by the way.
Thats why he is no longer the best at 140

Let me clear things up I am sorry If I confused you, I think hatton is the best fighter at 140 but he has nothing holding up his pants, so he should be going for belts or fighting the best at the weight, lucky for Hatton theres a gobby switch hitter in Bradford who has the highest regarded belt, is ranked No 1 and says he will fight him for f**k all

So Fight Him!


Question: At 140 not including Hatton who is better than Witter?

I pick Malinaggi over Witter at 140...I even go 50/50 in a bout with him and Hatton.

Paulie has one of the best jaw's in the game and his movement is enough to give anyone fit's....He wouldn't stand still long enough for either to get in any volume of shot's off at one time...Hatton's hit and hold would not be that effective due to the fact Paulie would be hard to tie up...Witter would not out box him or take him out with power....

People tend to forget all about Paulie because he is not a big puncher....

Nah Paulie looked awful in his last fight. And hasnt got any big wins on his record to suggest he could beat Witter .

1. Witter
2. Hatton
3. Malignaggi
4. Kotelnick
5. Torres

Thats how I see it