Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by SalTheButcher View Post
    what a joke



    guess golden boy wants to get involved with calzaghe
    Yeah. Floyd at top spot, that is. That's why no credible fan regards the Ring highly anymore. It has become so partisan and subjective. Floyd at number 1? Fukking BS.

  2. #2
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SalTheButcher View Post
    what a joke



    guess golden boy wants to get involved with calzaghe
    Yeah. Floyd at top spot, that is. That's why no credible fan regards the Ring highly anymore. It has become so partisan and subjective. Floyd at number 1? Fukking BS.

    Then who do you consider as no. 1 P4P ?

    .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SalTheButcher View Post
    what a joke



    guess golden boy wants to get involved with calzaghe
    Yeah. Floyd at top spot, that is. That's why no credible fan regards the Ring highly anymore. It has become so partisan and subjective. Floyd at number 1? Fukking BS.

    Then who do you consider as no. 1 P4P ?

    .
    Either the British Bomber or the Man from Manila.

  4. #4
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post

    Yeah. Floyd at top spot, that is. That's why no credible fan regards the Ring highly anymore. It has become so partisan and subjective. Floyd at number 1? Fukking BS.

    Then who do you consider as no. 1 P4P ?

    .
    Either the British Bomber or the Man from Manila.

    PAC has a claim to that no. 1 spot but Joe... no way...

    But anyone can make his own P4P list...

    .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,679
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2367
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Floyd is easily the most gifted fighter today. I do consider him #1 P4P but he should be dropped soon because of his inactivity and his unwillingness to fight the better fighters in his division. I could just imagine how crazy this forum would get if he was ever knocked out of the top spot.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,679
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2367
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Other than what I just said, to get back on topic, I think Joe should be #4 right behind Juan Manuel Marquez. That's just my opinion...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    So who deserves to be ahead of Calzaghe besides Floyd and Pac? JMM? He just lost to Pac. Hopkins? Obviously not, Calzaghe just beat him. Vazquez? He got stopped just three fights ago.

    Calzaghe is where he should be at #3 IMO.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1360
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by caleoh12 View Post
    Other than what I just said, to get back on topic, I think Joe should be #4 right behind Juan Manuel Marquez. That's just my opinion...
    JMM just lost to Pac (controversial I know, but thats the official ruling). Calzaghe just beat Bhop. How can JMM be ahead of Calzaghe? P4P rankings are very compeditive, if you lose a fight you drop down.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by caleoh12 View Post
    Floyd is easily the most gifted fighter today. I do consider him #1 P4P but he should be dropped soon because of his inactivity and his unwillingness to fight the better fighters in his division. I could just imagine how crazy this forum would get if he was ever knocked out of the top spot.
    What p4p fighter has Floyd beat SPECTACULARLY? NONE. Bear in mind that Hatton AT 147 is NOT by any means, a p4p fighter.

    Pac on the other hand has beaten MAB, Morales, JMM, all p4pers, and has beaten them by putting their HOFer asses on the floor, MANY TIMES. That is what a p4p king does. Potshotting your way to victory against Baldomir isn't p4p worthy. Nor is illegally using your elbows, shoulders against opponents.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,449
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1029
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Floyd must have slept with JLAQ's girlfriend. It's one thing to root for you're favorite fighter, and boo you're least favorite, but to say that every fighter Floyd has fought is a bum, and to say Pac has fought all the greatest is completely ridiculous.

    As for Joe, I got him three right now. Floyd is one, Pac- a very close second until Floyd decides to fight finally, and Joe. JMM and Pac r like a 2-headed monster, and should be tied, but with Pac escaping with the win, JMM falls 1. I put Joe ahead of him simply because,(with the exception of manfredo), his last fights have all been against champs. Overrated or not, they were champs, that were undefeated, and now he beat the concensus #1 light heavy, who is ranked as a p4p fighter,regardless of age, or any other excuse. All Joe has been doing is taking belts, and titles, he has no losses or draws. Although I think some of the other fighters might be better skilled, Joe has done enough lately, and others have lost.Just my opinion.

    Yes, Floyd beats a 43 yr old BHOP, p4p, and doesn't get dropped.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ohio.
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1001
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post

    Yeah. Floyd at top spot, that is. That's why no credible fan regards the Ring highly anymore. It has become so partisan and subjective. Floyd at number 1? Fukking BS.

    Then who do you consider as no. 1 P4P ?

    .
    Either the British Bomber or the Man from Manila.
    here is mine

    1. Mayweather.......no one is really close.
    2. Pacquiao
    3. Cotto
    4. Marquez
    5. Calzaghe

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Ring Magazine - latest edition in UK ?
    By Mark TKO in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-14-2008, 01:16 AM
  2. WBO rankings (Amir Khan in top ten) latest
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 08:54 PM
  3. The new ring rankings suck, and here's why!
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 05-26-2007, 02:08 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2007, 04:06 PM
  5. New Square-ring rankings
    By cityboy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-05-2006, 06:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing