Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post

    Yeah. Floyd at top spot, that is. That's why no credible fan regards the Ring highly anymore. It has become so partisan and subjective. Floyd at number 1? Fukking BS.

    Then who do you consider as no. 1 P4P ?

    .
    Either the British Bomber or the Man from Manila.

    PAC has a claim to that no. 1 spot but Joe... no way...

    But anyone can make his own P4P list...

    .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,679
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2367
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Floyd is easily the most gifted fighter today. I do consider him #1 P4P but he should be dropped soon because of his inactivity and his unwillingness to fight the better fighters in his division. I could just imagine how crazy this forum would get if he was ever knocked out of the top spot.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,679
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2367
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Other than what I just said, to get back on topic, I think Joe should be #4 right behind Juan Manuel Marquez. That's just my opinion...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1359
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    So who deserves to be ahead of Calzaghe besides Floyd and Pac? JMM? He just lost to Pac. Hopkins? Obviously not, Calzaghe just beat him. Vazquez? He got stopped just three fights ago.

    Calzaghe is where he should be at #3 IMO.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1359
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by caleoh12 View Post
    Other than what I just said, to get back on topic, I think Joe should be #4 right behind Juan Manuel Marquez. That's just my opinion...
    JMM just lost to Pac (controversial I know, but thats the official ruling). Calzaghe just beat Bhop. How can JMM be ahead of Calzaghe? P4P rankings are very compeditive, if you lose a fight you drop down.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    He should be #2.

    1. PBF
    2. Joe
    3. Paq
    4. JM Marquez
    5. BHOP


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    I got Joe at number 5.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1451
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Pac scored 5 wins against 3 future HOFers, 10 KDs and 3 KOs combined.

    Calzaghe got floored by a 43 year old future HOFer, and won by SD. I have no problem with him being in #3. But to those people who says he should take Pac's place are just being rediculous.

    Btw, Miguel Cotto should be at #4, and Israel Vazquez at 5.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    I would put him at 4 but to be honest, I've really soured on these P4P deals, do not like them much at all anymore. It seems like splitting hairs and pointless to compare fighters from different weight divisions and the lack of criteria really turned me off these.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2430
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    These lists are usually sh1te, but for those who say Joe doesn't deserve his place, can you tell us what more he can do and who else he has to beat.

    Everybody said he must fight Lacy - he fought and beat him
    Everybody said he must fight Kessler - he fought and beat him
    Everybody said he must fight B-Hop - he fought and beat him

    Regardless of what you think of his earlier career, he has fought the top 3 guys (whatever you think of Lacy with hindsight) that he could possibly have fought, if that doesn't deserve his status in the p4p list what does?

    Even VD has him at number 5 FFS

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,394
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1246
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    In my opinion , i think that Joe need to do more for be classified in the Top 10 P4P , probably we will place him , but cmon not in the Top , he just came yesterday to fight with the Best of the World in US , in where have the most of Best Boxers of the World in his Div.......

    THAT IS MY OPINION AND I RESPECT YOURS.......

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    mossley
    Posts
    129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    917
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    The 3rd Brit to go in will be David Haye. He has obliterated one division, and now he is about to embark to his second.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    792
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1046
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    honesly i wouldn't rank any higher then 5th at best, he hasn't proved anything with the hopkins fight and wouldn't prove anything fighting a old roy jones, so i wouldn't place him nowhere near the top, frankly if i had to stick him in it would be 10th

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,048
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5122
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Personally P4P lists baffle me...Are we judging The proven all around superior Boxer or The one who beats fellow P4P fighters?

    I can see him at 4th behind Mayweather/Pac/J.Marquez and Calzaghe.Yeh,I understand Marquez just lost a one point fight but Imo He is much more soundly and technically skilled than Calzaghe as an all around boxer.Regular weigt divisions are win or loss effected but does that negate your all around Skill as a P4P boxer??

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joe Calzaghe now no. 3 in Ring Mag's latest P4P rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Personally P4P lists baffle me...Are we judging The proven all around superior Boxer or The one who beats fellow P4P fighters?

    I can see him at 4th behind Mayweather/Pac/J.Marquez and Calzaghe.Yeh,I understand Marquez just lost a one point fight but Imo He is much more soundly and technically skilled than Calzaghe as an all around boxer.Regular weigt divisions are win or loss effected but does that negate your all around Skill as a P4P boxer??
    But then that brings you back to the question, can Marquez beat Nard in a p4p match-up? Or can Floyd? The answer is NOT SURE. But Joe did.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Ring Magazine - latest edition in UK ?
    By Mark TKO in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-14-2008, 01:16 AM
  2. WBO rankings (Amir Khan in top ten) latest
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 08:54 PM
  3. The new ring rankings suck, and here's why!
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 05-26-2007, 02:08 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2007, 04:06 PM
  5. New Square-ring rankings
    By cityboy in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-05-2006, 06:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing