It looks like to me that people are putting roy jones in at supermiddle weight in the HoF list because its a way of fitting him in the list, thats all.

How can you put him in the list as the greatest supermiddle of all time and ignore calzaghe when calzaghe's achievements at supermiddle destroy what roy jones achieved.

Come on lads, if an american fighter had been undisputed champ for 11 whole years in a division, holder of wba, ibf, wbo and wbc belts and totally unbeaten. Beaten lacy, eubank, reid and kessler in that division.

Yet a european fighter had been ibf champ for 2 years in the division and beaten only james toney as a great notable fighter...

WHO WOULD YOU BE PUTTING IN YOUR HALL OF FAME?

Hall of fame is about achievements, sorry guys, i respect a lot of your opinions and this post isnt about blindly following joe calzaghe because i think if calzaghe had fought RJJ at light heavy he wouldve probably lost, but you cant deny that joe calzaghe is a better fighter and achieved way more than jones did at super middle.

I understand you want to fit jones in the list, but your removing a guy who was totally dominant for 11 years in the division and holder of all the belts, fought the hardest opponents in the division aswell, for the sake of putting jones in at supermiddle weight.