Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Charlottetown, Canada
    Posts
    2,292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2628
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Wow. He really did take it to him, you pretty much have to agree with everything he says. I thought Golden Boy would be good for boxing when it first came about, since then I've got to say I think completely the opposite.
    Regardless of what The Ring Champions do: there are two constants
    1) the belt does not get stripped and can only change hands involuntarily in the Ring

    2) There is no sanctioning fee corruption, because there are no sanctioning fees.

    No matter who wins the Ring titles, because of these two constants, it will always be a more legitimate Belt then the alphabet titles.
    What you are missing though, is that in the very near future, there will be fighters without promotional ties to Golden Boy, who might never even get a crack at the belt, as they are not under Golden Boy's umbrella. GBP has already tried to exclude Nate from a shot at Manny by trying to set up a fight with JMM in November instead of "soon". That is what Nate is lashing out about.
    Last edited by Deanrw; 05-06-2008 at 08:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1357
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Deanrw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by lance Uppercut View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Wow. He really did take it to him, you pretty much have to agree with everything he says. I thought Golden Boy would be good for boxing when it first came about, since then I've got to say I think completely the opposite.
    Regardless of what The Ring Champions do: there are two constants
    1) the belt does not get stripped and can only change hands involuntarily in the Ring

    2) There is no sanctioning fee corruption, because there are no sanctioning fees.

    No matter who wins the Ring titles, because of these two constants, it will always be a more legitimate Belt then the alphabet titles.
    What you are missing though, is that in the very near future, there will be fighters without promotional ties to Golden Boy, who might never even get a crack at the belt, as they are not under Golden Boy's umbrella. GBP has already tried to exclude Nate from a shot at Manny by trying to set up a fight with JMM in November instead of "soon". That is what Nate is lashing out about.
    Exactly. It could potentially be no different than another sanctioning body in the near future, at least bit by bit as GBP fighters acquire the belts, or as GBP acquires ring champions And although the belt's can't be stripped, I don't believe they have ever had mandatory ring challengers, so DLH can sort of plot the way his champions are going to with defending the belts. Were already seeing him jerk people around to set up the matchups he want's, and there's no possibility of any sanctioning body or other promoters in the way. At least with sanctioning bodies and promoters they have bargaining power and a process on each side, with DLH both promoting and owning the title's his fighters hold is worrisome for the sport imo. I think it's very likely that the ring belts could quickly lose prestige as GBP becomes more involved with them. I mean you could liken this to Don King buying out Jose Suliman and becoming president of the WBC or something. Were already seeing huge conflicts happen at lightweight, and I do believe Casamyor is the only ring champ GBP has in it's stable...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1188
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

    I like this guy, he makes some good points. He must love being the man in the division with all the GB fighters ranked below him.
    Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1437
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

    Boy there sure is a lot of Golden Boy Promotions paranoia goin round here huh?

    Campbell is a pimp. Gotta agree with him though.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

    This is what I've been saying about GBP, and why I now dislike ODLH. Everyone knows Nate Campbell should be getting his choice of opponents holding 3 titles, but he is left scrounging for a fight. That shit aint right.....

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4448
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

    I am officially a Nate Campbell fan now!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Richard Schaefer: Possible Marquez-Barrera Rematch
    By :::PSL::: in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-26-2008, 08:20 AM
  2. Nate Campbell as Bhop
    By Julius Rain in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-11-2008, 03:03 AM
  3. Nate Campbell
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-11-2007, 11:44 AM
  4. Nate Campbell back July 6.
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 08:05 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-08-2007, 07:07 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing