An Open Letter to Richard Schaefer: From: Nate Campbell

[Deanrw]

Wow. He really did take it to him, you pretty much have to agree with everything he says. I thought Golden Boy would be good for boxing when it first came about, since then I've got to say I think completely the opposite.

Regardless of what The Ring Champions do: there are two constants
1) the belt does not get stripped and can only change hands involuntarily in the Ring

2) There is no sanctioning fee corruption, because there are no sanctioning fees.

No matter who wins the Ring titles, because of these two constants, it will always be a more legitimate Belt then the alphabet titles.

What you are missing though, is that in the very near future, there will be fighters without promotional ties to Golden Boy, who might never even get a crack at the belt, as they are not under Golden Boy's umbrella. GBP has already tried to exclude Nate from a shot at Manny by trying to set up a fight with JMM in November instead of "soon". That is what Nate is lashing out about.