If pavlik can catch joe clean like b-hop did early, it would be a quick nite
If pavlik can catch joe clean like b-hop did early, it would be a quick nite
Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.
Maybe.. but the point I make is Joe makes a hell of a lot of mistakes, and Hopkins made him pay for one, but unfortunately didn't bother fighting for the other 11 rounds. Joe does connect alot yeah, but how many of them do damage? I think there was 1 good punch that honestly hurt hopkins.
Im a fan of kelly, hes very exciting to watch and a nice guy too.
Im also a fan of joe's, i think he has the most ring craft in boxing today, aswell as being virtually a complete fighter, can fight inside, outside and outsmart everyone.
This would be one fight id love to see.
For my prediction i'll go with calzaghe.
My reason is that pavlik is great at coming forward and will fall into joe's traps. Pavlik is not particularly good fighting on the inside and trading (as we saw against miranda and esspecially against taylor early on when he got caught and floored in their first fight, he was hurt bad at that point.)
I think joe will be able to control the flow of the fight and pavlik will not be able to overcome the ringcraft of joe.
I predict a calzaghe win...im 60/40 on that outcome.
Once again, the 'weak, slapping, no power, brawler' will beat the best of america, in america.
Yet even after he does that...he will still be called a 'weak, slapping, no power, brawler' by everyone EVEN though he will have beaten eubank; lacy, kessler, hopkins, pavlik (maybe jones aswell if that fight happens before the pavlik fight). It really gets tiring seeing all the insults, but...people never learn![]()
Id love to see the fight aswell.
But how do you know pavlik is in his prime? You can only say when a fighter is in their prime by looking back after their career ends and seeing their greatest victory/performance.
Calzaghe fought kessler...errrrrr, was he not in his prime?
Hopkins was pretty damn good seeing as he bashed up winky and battered the crap out of tarver, at 42 the guy had adapted his game to make him a very tricky fighter, the fact he beat winky and totally destroyed tarver goes to prove how good he was...but he then got beaten by the 'weak, no power slapper' called calzaghe.
Lacy not in his prime?
Reid not in his prime?
Pavlik is 26, most athletes wont be in their prime till they are 30, calzaghe is past his prime, hes 36 years old!
So, let me ask the question...if calzaghe beats pavlik is he still a 'weak, slapping, no power brawler'?
This goes exactly back to the original prediction i made as my very first post on this board:
Calzaghe ends up fight
1. hopkins
2. jones, or the winner of tarver v dawson
3. pavlik
For his final 3 fights.
My prediction was that calzaghe beats all 3 of them and has defeated the best fighters america has had to put against him.
He will retire after having beaten:
1 eubank
2 reid
3 lacy
4 kessler
5 hopkins
6 jones, tarver or dawson
7 pavlik
Yet...hahahahaa even after defeating those great opponents PROVING he is the better fighter...people will still call him a 'weak, slapping, no power brawler'.
HAHAHAHA LETS WAIT N SEE IF MY PREDICTION COMES TRUE
Youve gotta admit though...it is quite funny that if calzaghe does beat them all and my prediction comes true, then its quite funny that people will still insult him.
I guess that makes eubank, reid, lacy, kessler, hopkins, pavlik, jones ALL A PILE OF TOTAL UTTER SH*T!!!
If calzaghe beats pavlik, then surely i can be justfied to call pavlik a SH*T FIGHTER?
Seeing as calzaghe beat kessler, kessler is a SH*T FIGHTER?
Hopkins is a SH*T FIGHTER!
When jones gets beat, he is a SH*T FIGHTER!
Afterall, theyve either been beaten or will be beaten by the 'weak, slapping, no power, brawler'...therefore THEY ARE EVEN WORSE THAN THAT...=======PURE SH*T FIGHTERS!![]()
Calzaghe is a weak slapper. He bats like a kitten. Hopkins after the fight looked like he just got back from a good jog. Calzaghe's style and his power to me is really unimpressive. Pull me up one video like this of Calzaghe then maybe I will respect him. He had all the time back in the day to fight Toney, Jones Jr or Hopkins but it was never done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HchCpnORAqk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QJwtmv86x8
Why even have his fists clenched... I say since they have Reyes gloves for punchers and Grants are softer... Why not have Calzaghes... They'd look like oven mits... If you'd like to see how the propper punch should be thrown would be just watch this video. This is the perfect form to get the most from your new Calzaghe gloves...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=UTmfFLCKErY
Hidden Content
"There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk
Hidden Content
"There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk
WHo's resume is better. Calzaghe's or Jones Jr. Maybe I should remind you they never faced each other 10 years ago right around the same time when Jones knocked a guy down a few times in one round and was never hit. This was in a title match. Probably the greatest round in boxing history. Roy Jones Jr is the greatest fighter I have ever scene. I was a joy watching this Leonardo DaVinci of boxing do is art work. It was a beautiful thing to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gexazLr6pSY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPT6E...eature=related
If I were to die today the first thing I would ask the lord is if I could watch a Sugar Ray Robinson Fight Roy Jones Jr. and Kelly Pavlik fight Marvin Hagler.
At his peak RJJ was the greatest boxer in the world, perhaps one of the top 10 all-time greats, but the fact is, however good a boxer he was, he sullied his own reputation by not knowing when to call it a day and when he didn't have all the skills he had when he was doing that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks