Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Calzaghe's Ring status

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wales GB
    Posts
    763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    946
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    He should not be allowed to retain both belts.. I read an Editors note in the ring that said if he does not defend or relnquish the belts within 12 months they ask him to voluntarily relinquish the title...If he doesn't want too then i suppose he could keep both.And seing as the ring "ask" there titlists to relinquish the belt; I dont think they ever expected anyone to say no im keeping both though.
    "It wasn't the night of the jab"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Fighting City of Philadelphia
    Posts
    2,469
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1564
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by Tins06 View Post
    He should not be allowed to retain both belts.. I read an Editors note in the ring that said if he does not defend or relnquish the belts within 12 months they ask him to voluntarily relinquish the title...If he doesn't want too then i suppose he could keep both.And seing as the ring "ask" there titlists to relinquish the belt; I dont think they ever expected anyone to say no im keeping both though.
    The Ring addresses that situation and notes that everyone so far has "done the right thing" and giving up a belt they no longer wish to defend. They even listed a half a dozen fighters who moved up in weight and voluntarily reqlinquished their championships.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1441
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by Tins06 View Post
    He should not be allowed to retain both belts.. I read an Editors note in the ring that said if he does not defend or relnquish the belts within 12 months they ask him to voluntarily relinquish the title...If he doesn't want too then i suppose he could keep both.And seing as the ring "ask" there titlists to relinquish the belt; I dont think they ever expected anyone to say no im keeping both though.

    If a guy is a multi weight world champion until someone from said division can beat him he should be considered the champ of that division just so long as he abides to fight within the 12month time frame.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wales GB
    Posts
    763
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    946
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins06 View Post
    He should not be allowed to retain both belts.. I read an Editors note in the ring that said if he does not defend or relnquish the belts within 12 months they ask him to voluntarily relinquish the title...If he doesn't want too then i suppose he could keep both.And seing as the ring "ask" there titlists to relinquish the belt; I dont think they ever expected anyone to say no im keeping both though.

    If a guy is a multi weight world champion until someone from said division can beat him he should be considered the champ of that division just so long as he abides to fight within the 12month time frame.
    Thats fair enough but he should not be allowed too campaign at both weights..defending both Belts.
    "It wasn't the night of the jab"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1441
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by Tins06 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins06 View Post
    He should not be allowed to retain both belts.. I read an Editors note in the ring that said if he does not defend or relnquish the belts within 12 months they ask him to voluntarily relinquish the title...If he doesn't want too then i suppose he could keep both.And seing as the ring "ask" there titlists to relinquish the belt; I dont think they ever expected anyone to say no im keeping both though.

    If a guy is a multi weight world champion until someone from said division can beat him he should be considered the champ of that division just so long as he abides to fight within the 12month time frame.
    Thats fair enough but he should not be allowed too campaign at both weights..defending both Belts.

    why not i say

    if JC is the best at 168, he deserves to be recognised for it. Not forced to relinquish a title just because his next fight is at a different weight.

    Famous old saying has never been so true "to be the man you have to beat the man"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3147
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    I have no problem with Him being #1 Ring champ of 2 divisions, as long as he defends them both within a reasonable time its all good to me...

    To me he can defend the Lightheavy crown against Roy Jones in Nov of 08 and then drop down to 168 and Defend against Miranda in June of 09..

    I think since Calzaghe is a legend and has earned this status as well as being long in tooth he would end up only doing this for a year anyway and its not like there is a young Kessleresque guy at 175 that deserves a shot tomorrow, so I am pleased with the current status, seems completely fair, any fighter who cares to complain should try to measure there career against Joes and 99.9% of them wouldnt measure up..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    716
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1211
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    I have no problem with Him being #1 Ring champ of 2 divisions, as long as he defends them both within a reasonable time its all good to me...

    To me he can defend the Lightheavy crown against Roy Jones in Nov of 08 and then drop down to 168 and Defend against Miranda in June of 09..

    I think since Calzaghe is a legend and has earned this status as well as being long in tooth he would end up only doing this for a year anyway and its not like there is a young Kessleresque guy at 175 that deserves a shot tomorrow, so I am pleased with the current status, seems completely fair, any fighter who cares to complain should try to measure there career against Joes and 99.9% of them wouldnt measure up..
    I get where you are coming from, but I still think a fighter should fight in his division at least every 12 months. Otherwise it hardly fits as 'his division' any more. In your proposed schedule Calzaghe will go almost 20 months without fights at 168 - that seems a bit much for my taste.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3147
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Actually good point....my theory would only be reasonable if he defended at 168 1st... Thanks for the correction

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    4,759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1319
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4417
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1189
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    Correct, just like Joe holds championships at 175 and 168 right now
    An What

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    4,759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1319
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    As long as he hasn't lost his midle weight belt before then, or doesn't vacate when he moves up, then yes.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1744
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So when Pavlik steps up and beats Joe at 168 he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?

    I fixed it for you
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ohio.
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    991
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    If Calzaghe comes in over 168 Pavlik will get the 175 belts. If Calzaghe goes at 168 Pavlik will hold all three. This will be the first time in this sport that this has happened since 1938.

    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    He would hold all three and a defenite future in the hall of fame as well.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Decisions, decisions. Poor Joe Calzaghe having to sit home and decide on what weight shall he be king in. One thing is for certain there is little left to doubt him about even for his sternest critics.

    I would like to see him take a go at the 175lb division. He has solidified himself as the greatest 168lb champion to reign why not a new challenge.

    No matter what he chooses I am sure he will be successful.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Calzaghe's hands?
    By eagle in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-19-2008, 02:05 AM
  2. ATG status
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 06:17 PM
  3. Laila Ali to get Champion Emeritus status
    By Purist in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-24-2007, 09:25 PM
  4. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-07-2007, 08:37 AM
  5. Does Judah's performance elevate or lower his status?
    By Mr. Nightmare in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 02:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing