Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Calzaghe's Ring status

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    4,759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1320
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4417
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1190
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    Correct, just like Joe holds championships at 175 and 168 right now
    An What

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    4,759
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1320
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    As long as he hasn't lost his midle weight belt before then, or doesn't vacate when he moves up, then yes.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1744
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    So when Pavlik steps up and beats Joe at 168 he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?

    I fixed it for you
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ohio.
    Posts
    1,148
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    991
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Calzaghe's Ring status

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Preme View Post
    The SMw is open right now, sure a lot are tipping Kessler to rule it, but there are a few there to stake a claim, and since none are as of yet going to fight eachother the Ring could not name a new champion.

    If the #2 was about to face the #3 you can bet your left nut the ring would put preasure on Calzaghe to vacate it if he was fighting at 175, or strip him of it.

    And it is fair IMO, devisions need champions.

    they are letting him hold both right now because pavlik could move up and joe come back down to meet at SMw, the ring do want the best to have their belts, should pavlik win, and he has a good chance, they would want him to take their belt.
    If Calzaghe comes in over 168 Pavlik will get the 175 belts. If Calzaghe goes at 168 Pavlik will hold all three. This will be the first time in this sport that this has happened since 1938.

    So if Pavlik steps up and meets Joe at 168 and beats him (theoretically) he would hold the ring titles at 160 and 168 correct?
    He would hold all three and a defenite future in the hall of fame as well.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Calzaghe's hands?
    By eagle in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-19-2008, 02:05 AM
  2. ATG status
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 06:17 PM
  3. Laila Ali to get Champion Emeritus status
    By Purist in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-24-2007, 09:25 PM
  4. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-07-2007, 08:37 AM
  5. Does Judah's performance elevate or lower his status?
    By Mr. Nightmare in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-14-2006, 02:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing