All Middle Eastern leaders are rational.
All Middle Eastern leaders are rational.
Ahmadinijad, al-Otari, The Saudi's, Abbas....basically all of them
Ahmadinejad doesn't rule Iran, the clerics do, it's a theocracy, remember? Ahmadinejad runs the country, the clerics rule the nation, and they're plenty rational. They certainly outsmarted dumbass George Bush in Iraq, didn't they?
In what way are the Saudis irrational? Or Abbas? Otari is a placeman for the Assad family, who again are plenty rational. What do these guys do that's irrational?
The Saudi's meeting with Osama and doing other extremely sketchy things....and they expect America to just be OK with that....THAT is irrational.
Abbas wants to destroy Israel...Memoirs of a Palestinian Terrorist...that's his autobiography where he says he partially funded the 1972 Munich Olympic massacre.
If Ahmadinijad doesn't run things then OK so the mullahs are irrational then and yes they are....they live in the past and still tell stories of the fucking Crusades. They need to get real and start cooperating with the rest of the world.
The Bush family still do business with the Bin Laden family, as do the Saudis. And it's not irrational for Muslim nationalists like those guys to meet. You'll have to come up with something better than that. Bin Laden also met with representatives of all major Arab governments, all governments which we currently prop up.
All Palestinian leaders are former terrorists, just like the current Catholic leaders in Northern Ireland or Israel's leaders for the first fifty years of its existence. And it's a rational position for Abbas to take. If a foreign power was occupying North Carolina and building houses all over it and declaring it their territory, what would your rational response be?
The Iranian mullahs would love a rational relationship with the rest of the world but are prevented from having one by the US.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks