So Barrera was washed up when PAC destroyed him in 2003? As far as I can remember MAB was just being celebrated as a pound for pound elite because he just demolished NAZ.
Nobody wanted to fight the then AVOIDED JUAN, PAC stepped up and fought him, that both MAB and EM did not do.
EM did beat PAC but PAC avenged that via Back to back kayoes that nobody has done to EM not Raheem, not MAB and not David Diaz.
I'll ask you this one if PACMAN knocks out Marquez in their trilogy would you consider Marquez washed up then?
Yeah cuz Marquez will be 35 when the fight happens. a decade ago at 25 Marquez would own him . I think Marquez won the 1st two fights anyway but as I already said, Pac would be odds on vs Marquez in the 3rd fight cuz hed be too old and pacs still fresh
So Nov 03 is Pacs last good win over a fighter who wasnt washed up ? Barrera was his worst ever that night and even did better when he was 34 coming off a loss in the rematch.
All we ask for is that Pac fights someone with a pulse . Someone who is young and hungry with a career infront of them not behind them . Thats all . Is it too much to ask off someone who claims to be the best . BTW beating Diaz does not make him the best lightweight. Diaz was barely top 5.
Game how did D. Diaz get robbed?
Well maybe his occupation, pride, and a quart of blood...
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
I agree with you 100%
I wasn't able to order the fight because I am 50 bucks overdue and it kept rejecting my order. Still, I was ordering because I thought Pac might get sent back down in weight not because he is a joy to watch.
I thought Marquez beat him the second time. (and the first time)
hahaha. why is game so anti-pac?
After every Pacquaio fight this is what usually happens. I've learned to adjust to these Pac-haters.
After Mayweather's retirement, Pac is p4p#1. FACT.
He won over Marquez, with a knockdown....FACT.
He castigated Morales into retirement. FACT.
He dominated Barrera after Barrera won over Naz. FACT.
He battered DIAZ, the title holder of the WBC lightweight belt. FACT.
Pac hasn't ducked anyone. FACT.
Guzman is complaining coz he wasn't given chance to fight Pac. Was that Pac's fault? Was it the fault of Pac that Joan was still a nobody during that time compared to Morales, Barrera and MArquez and therefore, it would not be that challenging and lucrative to fight him?
Let's appeal to FACTS not on emotions and what you think Guys!
Argumentum ad Misericordiam is not a valid argument in boxing!
Ikariam
I can't tell you how many times That the purchase of a PPV is based on the undercard for myself.It was actually a solid undercard with Santiago/Luevano and Soto/Lorenzo.The exposure of the Giant boxing Bear fields also helped.Ecspecially in a main event that was thought to be,and proved to be one sided going in.Also knowing that these days HBO will be reairing it in it's entirety the following week.Pac has managed to cross over in tremendous fashion to the Masses but still has a little ways to go in marketability Imo.I'd like to see him unify The title as opposed to predictably what is so popular.....jumping divisions for name fights.....Hatton is so very tempting.
Last edited by Spicoli; 06-30-2008 at 03:04 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks