Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 77

Thread: This May Sound Bitter But Pac isin't A $49.95 Fighter

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    1,787
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1417
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: This May Sound Bitter But Pac isin't A $49.95 Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    I think the key is in what people are saying here. You need two to tango, I have no problem with a legitimate great matchup being on PPV but these one sided affairs are better left on regular HBO. The undercard was great though and my guess is we wouldn't have seen all the fights on regular HBO so no complaints there. I'm glad HBO has ditched the 2 fight undercard for the most part.


  2. #2
    Addicted to_boxing Guest

    Default Re: This May Sound Bitter But Pac isin't A $49.95 Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by bcollins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    I think the key is in what people are saying here. You need two to tango, I have no problem with a legitimate great matchup being on PPV but these one sided affairs are better left on regular HBO. The undercard was great though and my guess is we wouldn't have seen all the fights on regular HBO so no complaints there. I'm glad HBO has ditched the 2 fight undercard for the most part.


    The better statement is which future Pac fight is woth $49.95 ? Based on his new weight class none. The talent pool there and their personalities do not serve interest to anyone but Pac fans.

    Asking JMM to move up to 135 would also be a farce, being that JMM can not KO Pac at 130.

    So only a A Guzman fight based upon Guzman's performance at 135 warrants $49.95. Pac should be cashing in. However, Pac is now a victim of mediocore and inexperienced talent. MAB and EM were worn and old. Poor Pac is just a victim of poor timing. His ceiling has just been lowered by lack of legitimate opponents.


    JMM has been Pac's really only true competition and the 2 fights were controversial.

  3. #3
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: This May Sound Bitter But Pac isin't A $49.95 Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by Addicted to_boxing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bcollins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    I think the key is in what people are saying here. You need two to tango, I have no problem with a legitimate great matchup being on PPV but these one sided affairs are better left on regular HBO. The undercard was great though and my guess is we wouldn't have seen all the fights on regular HBO so no complaints there. I'm glad HBO has ditched the 2 fight undercard for the most part.


    The better statement is which future Pac fight is woth $49.95 ? Based on his new weight class none. The talent pool there and their personalities do not serve interest to anyone but Pac fans.

    Asking JMM to move up to 135 would also be a farce, being that JMM can not KO Pac at 130.

    So only a A Guzman fight based upon Guzman's performance at 135 warrants $49.95. Pac should be cashing in. However, Pac is now a victim of mediocore and inexperienced talent. MAB and EM were worn and old. Poor Pac is just a victim of poor timing. His ceiling has just been lowered by lack of legitimate opponents.


    JMM has been Pac's really only true competition and the 2 fights were controversial.
    Oh please how can you say theres no interesting match ups for Pacquiao at 135 ?? its one of the hottest divisions in boxing at the moment probably only 2nd to Welterweight.

    Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez vs Joel Casamayor Winner.
    Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Diaz vs Michael Katsidis winner.
    Manny Pacquiao vs Joan Guzman vs Nate Campbell winner.

    Any of these match ups are worth paying for, and i hate people like you who just hate on a fighter no matter what they do. His 1st fight with Barrera, Barrera was not long coming off his best performance against Naseem Hamed, and also had a few other victory's over good opposition and was looking better than ever and showed no sign's of being shot in fact he looked at his peak. How can you actually sit there and not give Pacquiao his credit for dominating Barrera ?? and people also exaggerate how shot Morales was as well. Morales was still a very good fighter in both fights with Pacquiao, and Pacquiao deserves his credit for those 2 fights. And even the 3rd fight because no one has ever done to Morales what Pacquiao did.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: This May Sound Bitter But Pac isin't A $49.95 Fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Addicted to_boxing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bcollins View Post



    The better statement is which future Pac fight is woth $49.95 ? Based on his new weight class none. The talent pool there and their personalities do not serve interest to anyone but Pac fans.

    Asking JMM to move up to 135 would also be a farce, being that JMM can not KO Pac at 130.

    So only a A Guzman fight based upon Guzman's performance at 135 warrants $49.95. Pac should be cashing in. However, Pac is now a victim of mediocore and inexperienced talent. MAB and EM were worn and old. Poor Pac is just a victim of poor timing. His ceiling has just been lowered by lack of legitimate opponents.


    JMM has been Pac's really only true competition and the 2 fights were controversial.
    Oh please how can you say theres no interesting match ups for Pacquiao at 135 ?? its one of the hottest divisions in boxing at the moment probably only 2nd to Welterweight.

    Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez vs Joel Casamayor Winner.
    Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Diaz vs Michael Katsidis winner.
    Manny Pacquiao vs Joan Guzman vs Nate Campbell winner.

    Any of these match ups are worth paying for, and i hate people like you who just hate on a fighter no matter what they do. His 1st fight with Barrera, Barrera was not long coming off his best performance against Naseem Hamed, and also had a few other victory's over good opposition and was looking better than ever and showed no sign's of being shot in fact he looked at his peak. How can you actually sit there and not give Pacquiao his credit for dominating Barrera ?? and people also exaggerate how shot Morales was as well. Morales was still a very good fighter in both fights with Pacquiao, and Pacquiao deserves his credit for those 2 fights. And even the 3rd fight because no one has ever done to Morales what Pacquiao did.
    well said ICB.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: This May Sound Bitter But Pac isin't A $49.95 Fighter

    I haven't read the first three or four pages so I've probably missed some stuff

    Quote Originally Posted by Addicted to_boxing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bcollins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    I think the key is in what people are saying here. You need two to tango, I have no problem with a legitimate great matchup being on PPV but these one sided affairs are better left on regular HBO. The undercard was great though and my guess is we wouldn't have seen all the fights on regular HBO so no complaints there. I'm glad HBO has ditched the 2 fight undercard for the most part.


    The better statement is which future Pac fight is woth $49.95 ? Based on his new weight class none. The talent pool there and their personalities do not serve interest to anyone but Pac fans.

    Asking JMM to move up to 135 would also be a farce, being that JMM can not KO Pac at 130.

    So only a A Guzman fight based upon Guzman's performance at 135 warrants $49.95. Pac should be cashing in. However, Pac is now a victim of mediocore and inexperienced talent. MAB and EM were worn and old. Poor Pac is just a victim of poor timing. His ceiling has just been lowered by lack of legitimate opponents.


    JMM has been Pac's really only true competition and the 2 fights were controversial.
    Congratulations, this is one of the worst posts I've read in a long time.

    JMM's already moving up to 135 and since, according to many, he's already beaten Pac once, maybe twice, why a fight at 135 would be a farce is beyond me.

    So Guzman-Pac is acceptable because of Guzman's performances at 135? He's never fought at 135, the highest he's ever weighed for a fight was 132, but still you may be on to something there.

    And Marquez was Pac's only true competition. Really

    I don't know why I felt the need to explain why that was such a bad post

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Enzo Calzaghe is one bitter man!!!
    By leftylee in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-19-2008, 08:42 AM
  2. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 04-10-2007, 12:25 AM
  3. Replies: 110
    Last Post: 03-21-2007, 11:33 AM
  4. Hopkins Still Sounds Bitter
    By Bx730NY in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-16-2007, 08:35 AM
  5. UFC 61:Bitter Rivals: The Fight card!
    By bitz_piss in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-10-2006, 05:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing