
Originally Posted by
SaddoBoxer

Originally Posted by
killersheep
Stop..............just stop, there is no legacy in beating a geriatric ODLH.
PAC wins- ODLH was over the hill.
ODLH wins - PAC was too small.
There are too many excuses for a loss before this fight is even made. Do you think PBF has a legacy because he beat Oscar? NO. People are complaining because he didn't unify a division, is this starting to sound familiar?
It's about the money and nothing else there is no justification for legacy in this fight, if he would have fought the Golden Boy 3 years ago it would have mattered for something, now it's just cash.
I can't understand you people... You're unbelievable...
First you're totally writing off PAC in this fight. You're saying that PAC has NO CHANCE AT ALL of winning this fight.
Then if PAC does the impossible and defeats Oscar, you will not give him any credit since Oscar is already "old and shot"...
I can't believeeeeeeee this...
What I can't believe is that you need 18 threads to make the same statements. C'mon man. Are you gonna say the ODLH is in his prime? Especially after the Forbes fight? I'm not a fan of either fighter, although I am entertained by both and because of you fanatics I am actually gonna root for ODLH just so I don't have to suffer any more of these threads. It's you I can't believe look up delusional in the dictionary you arguments for saying this will add to PAC's legacy is the first definition.
And yes ODLH is old and shot, his stamina sucks, his punches have slowed and his focus is much more easily swayed than ever before. All of those reasons are the only reason
PAC has a chance because ODLH is NOT THE BOXER HE ONCE WAS, but because of his size I still say he wins.
Bookmarks