Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 78

Thread: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    the only noticable on is calzaghe who the hell are the others i mean the super middle weight division is a sorry ass division just as jr middle the only noticable SMWs are kissler calzaghe lacy and now taylor who i think will be the top of that division next year

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    the only noticable on is calzaghe who the hell are the others i mean the super middle weight division is a sorry ass division just as jr middle the only noticable SMWs are kissler calzaghe lacy and now taylor who i think will be the top of that division next year
    Who the fuck has Palik fought apart from Taylor??

    Lets see Miranda who i put on the same level as Andrade who Kessler fought, Kessler has fought Three different World Champions, Pavlik has fought one. So i dont understand where you get this Kessler has not got the experience of Pavlik? I think you need to go do a bit more research.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    the only noticable on is calzaghe who the hell are the others i mean the super middle weight division is a sorry ass division just as jr middle the only noticable SMWs are kissler calzaghe lacy and now taylor who i think will be the top of that division next year
    Serious your knowledge is poor of the 168 divison if you think Lacy is a notable fighter in the division, the 168 division right now has some great fighters who would smash Lacy to pieces Bute, Froch to name two would take Lacy out. Taylor also ducked Froch.

    Im sorry but to me your one of the fans who dismisses anything that hasnt been on mainstream Us television Hbo/Showtime.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    man 168 is a bum ass division in my eyes carl froch is a nobody everybody knows lacy im not sayin i like lacy actually i dont like anybody at 168 dude that division sucks so bad calzaghe left it to fight at lightheavy now prove me wrong

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    937
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    man 168 is a bum ass division in my eyes carl froch is a nobody everybody knows lacy im not sayin i like lacy actually i dont like anybody at 168 dude that division sucks so bad calzaghe left it to fight at lightheavy now prove me wrong


    168lbs is one of the deepest in boxing today.

    And Pavlik after seeing him a 166 would be top 5 no more until he wins a few.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    937
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    so what your sayin is hopkins is gonna beat pavlik right

    50-50.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1431
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    man 168 is a bum ass division in my eyes carl froch is a nobody everybody knows lacy im not sayin i like lacy actually i dont like anybody at 168 dude that division sucks so bad calzaghe left it to fight at lightheavy now prove me wrong


    168lbs is one of the deepest in boxing today.

    And Pavlik after seeing him a 166 would be top 5 no more until he wins a few.
    I think that 168 division has one of the best up and coming fighters in the world today in Daniel Jacobs!

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    man 168 is a bum ass division in my eyes carl froch is a nobody everybody knows lacy im not sayin i like lacy actually i dont like anybody at 168 dude that division sucks so bad calzaghe left it to fight at lightheavy now prove me wrong
    What its a dumbass division because you dont know anyone? Come on you said in your previous statement Lacy is one of the better fighters, now you saying you only mentioned him becasue people know him, to be honest i think your the only dumbass round here.

    Calzaghe left because he wanted the money fights and at this stage they are at 175.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2573
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    i never said lacy was a good fighter loser i said he was a noticable SMW and get off my thread its for pavlik fans

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1744
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Wow!


    What the hell happened while I was gone?!?!

    How can anyone call 168 a shit division... Go look at Jr Middleweight if you want to see virtually no depth...

    168 has become one of my favorite divisions behind some of the little guys, light and welterwight divs...

    SMW has emmense depth and skill.

    Mikkel Kessler
    Mundine
    Taylor
    Froch
    Lacy
    Andrade
    Bika
    Tsypko
    Manfredo
    Green
    Dirrel
    Mirranda
    Pascal
    Ward

    and you still have...

    Bute
    Beyer
    Codrington
    Mendy
    Henshaw
    Banks
    Buchanan


    C'mon dude!

    This is one of the toughest and most competetive divs in boxing today...
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    937
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    i never said lacy was a good fighter loser i said he was a noticable SMW and get off my thread its for pavlik fans

    What a strange person.

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    i never said lacy was a good fighter loser i said he was a noticable SMW and get off my thread its for pavlik fans

    What a strange person.
    Very strange, i suppose if you dont want to praise Kelly Pavlik with your tongue your not welcome.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1744
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by kingfrnk View Post
    i never said lacy was a good fighter loser i said he was a noticable SMW and get off my thread its for pavlik fans

    What a strange person.
    Very strange, i suppose if you dont want to praise Kelly Pavlik with your tongue your not welcome.

    LOL, I'm a huge Pav fan! He's my profile pic.

    I believe him to quickly becoming the centerpiece of American boxing but that's not to say I won't give my oppinion otherwise.

    Kelly's not a world beater or ender.
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1103
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Well i think Pavlik beating Taylor is better then anything Kessler has done. Lets not for get the man who out classed Kessler had a way more difficult time then Taylor did with Hopkins and that was a older version of Hopkins. Also look at what Kessler been up not much of anything so i dont think much of him

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1384
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Can Kelly Pavlik do damage at 175?

    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post


    What a strange person.
    Very strange, i suppose if you dont want to praise Kelly Pavlik with your tongue your not welcome.

    LOL, I'm a huge Pav fan! He's my profile pic.

    I believe him to quickly becoming the centerpiece of American boxing but that's not to say I won't give my oppinion otherwise.

    Kelly's not a world beater or ender.
    I totally agree Pride, great entertaining fighter, i like the guy. I got in on this debate with the thread starter because he says Kessler hasnt got the experience of Pavlik? Which i just thought was a bizzare statement.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Kelly Pavlik
    By The Fightfan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-11-2008, 04:25 PM
  2. Kelly Pavlik fan website
    By affliction1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-29-2008, 03:20 PM
  3. Damn I like Kelly Pavlik
    By Greig in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-01-2008, 10:20 PM
  4. Kelly Pavlik!!! WOW
    By zekebox in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-10-2006, 12:44 AM
  5. Kelly Pavlik
    By TaxanBaller in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-18-2006, 08:52 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing