want to test a little theory

[Thread Stealer]

Three words ROY JONES JR.

Too easy to nitpick and criticize his resume.

Fighters of the past are harder because they were fighting so frequently and often against quality opposition.

[PRIDE OF BOSTON]

Three words ROY JONES JR.

Too easy to nitpick and criticize his resume.

Fighters of the past are harder because they were fighting so frequently and often against quality opposition.

Mmmm, good point.

[Mr140]

Alright my favorite fighter is and always will be Sugar Ray Leonard. Alright here are the highlights to his career he was a champion WW, LMW, MW, SMW and LHW and also his best wins as Duran, Hearns, Benitez and Hagler he was the top dog out of all of them only one beat them all. He was also in one of the toughest eras of boxing so go ahead and pick away.

[hitmanhatton]

Alright my favorite fighter is and always will be Sugar Ray Leonard. Alright here are the highlights to his career he was a champion WW, LMW, MW, SMW and LHW and also his best wins as Duran, Hearns, Benitez and Hagler he was the top dog out of all of them only one beat them all. He was also in one of the toughest eras of boxing so go ahead and pick away.

ok all ican really say to that is

1) fought a very stupid fight in terms of tactics in the first duran fight
2) Hagler win is very much debatable along with the draw in the second Hearns fight
3) went on too long and ruined his own legacy
4) seemed to shy away from a mega fight with Aaron Pryor

[Mr140]

Well all i can say to that is Duran fight yea was stupid could of beat him like he did the other times. He was on a long layoff and he was moving up in weight against Hagler. Hearns the next time around he was old and for Pryor i dont buy the ducking thing because he fought Hearns who ruined his eye and i think a harder fight then Pryor. Well all i go to say good job good point on my favorite fighter Suager Ray Leonard andi was just trying to nit pick your pick but it just wanted to see what you thought of it.

[Thread Stealer]

Well all i can say to that is Duran fight yea was stupid could of beat him like he did the other times. He was on a long layoff and he was moving up in weight against Hagler. Hearns the next time around he was old and for Pryor i dont buy the ducking thing because he fought Hearns who ruined his eye and i think a harder fight then Pryor. Well all i go to say good job good point on my favorite fighter Suager Ray Leonard andi was just trying to nit pick your pick but it just wanted to see what you thought of it.

I NEVER bought the Pryor ducking thing and have grown to dislike Legendary Nights (a series I very much enjoyed when it came out) because of things I've read such as "Leonard was scared of Pryor, didn't you watch the documentary?").

But this is a thread about nitpicking resumes and achievements, so it's fair game.

[Scrap]

Boxed Thomas Hearns instead what a copout Interestly Charles by 49 was diagnosed with a form of M S which eventually He died from, a Fantastic Warrior He had good wins in 41 when He was 19, some Fighter

[rjj tszyu]

Alright my favorite fighter is and always will be Sugar Ray Leonard. Alright here are the highlights to his career he was a champion WW, LMW, MW, SMW and LHW and also his best wins as Duran, Hearns, Benitez and Hagler he was the top dog out of all of them only one beat them all. He was also in one of the toughest eras of boxing so go ahead and pick away.

ok all ican really say to that is

1) fought a very stupid fight in terms of tactics in the first duran fight
2) Hagler win is very much debatable along with the draw in the second Hearns fight
3) went on too long and ruined his own legacy
4) seemed to shy away from a mega fight with Aaron Pryor

He underestimated Duran fair enough. I feel Hagler result was accurate although I agree Hearns 2 was a bit off. I don't think he ruined his legacy at all with his 2 late defeats it's very rare a boxer doesn't go on too long including Ali and SRR. I didn't know there was much serious talk of a fight with Pryor and if there was what weight was it going to be at? If it was at WW I think SRL takes a hard fought but clear decision. If they could have made it a 140lbs fight then I think Leonard may have been weight drained and Pryor would take a decision.

[Thread Stealer]

Alright my favorite fighter is and always will be Sugar Ray Leonard. Alright here are the highlights to his career he was a champion WW, LMW, MW, SMW and LHW and also his best wins as Duran, Hearns, Benitez and Hagler he was the top dog out of all of them only one beat them all. He was also in one of the toughest eras of boxing so go ahead and pick away.

Here's my attempt at nit-picking.

Wilfred Benitez trained just 5 days for the Leonard fight, less than his usual 8 days of training, and chased women 4 days a week during his "camp", rather than his usual 3 days a week. He was also dating Ray's sister.

Roberto Duran peaked two divisions lower, and won clearly. Leonard gave Duran an immediate rematch, knowing Duran would balloon in weight and party, and Duran was weakened for the rematch. Still, Duran was competitive before quitting.

Tommy Hearns was two pounds under 147, perhaps overtrained, and who knows if Leonard could've gotten to Hearns if the fight were scheduled for 12 rounds, like today's rules?

Ayub Kalule was untested.

Leonard waited until he had seen that Marvin Hagler had slowed, and even then, it was a controversial decision. He made Donny Lalonde shrink down from his natural weight so he could fight for two divisional titles, and only rematched Hearns because Tommy appeared to be a shot fighter.

Leonard fought sporadically from 1982-on, never fighting the likes of Mike McCallum, Michael Nunn, etc..