I havent seen much of Pascal and Froch may beat him but what does it prove?

Pascal is in the same position as Froch, almost the same amount of fights against no one of any consequence, the only difference being that Pascall has done it over 3 years and not 6

Regardless of what skills I may have missed from Froch, I think his age may hurt him, ok hes not had ANY hard fights but to wait till your 31 to face your first live opponent is a risk in itself.

His gullible supporters keep telling us that his reflexes are awesome, well ive seen him caught by alot of shots, including that windmill right hand from a sadly old Reid, if he cant avoide punches from old, retired, beat up, never was's then hes gonna have a shock when he steps in with someone who ive noticed is sharp and quick.

Pascal may not have alot of power but I saw he is quite snappy, with Carls slowing reflexes and never having had to learn to avoid anything dangerous, I can see Pascal peppering Froch and keeping a distance (because he may have read Tams assesments on Frochs awesome power) to a decision.

The other thing is, Pascal has boxed 67 rounds in 6 fights since the beggining of 07 compared to frochs 11 rounds in 3 fights, ok he may have the higher ko percentage but against who??

Pascal will do the distance easy, Froch will struggle.