calzaghe haters a question

**BIG H** · 11-09-2008 05:16 PM

The things that really makes me laugh is the fact that these people always tip him to lose and only find the excuses after the wins

Still amzes me how everbody 'knew' Lacy was so overhyped, when perhaps 2 or 3 people even suggested it beforehand

**Saddo** · 11-09-2008 10:22 PM

Originally Posted by BIG H

when perhaps 2 or 3 people even suggested it beforehand

trust me mate... i have a very good memory and no body mentioned it before hand

only a few afterwards and then as the weeks past everyone was saying it

**awdleyfuturehalloffamer** · 11-09-2008 10:35 PM

Hopkins was beat by about 4 rounds. It wasn't close and calzaghe should have won by unanimous decision if one of the judges wasn't in the bag for hopkins.

**THE THIRD MAN** · 11-10-2008 04:47 AM

Calzaghe deserves full credit for his win against Kessler, so why not do it again? That would do it for me, he beats a prime injury free Mikkel Kessler again and he is an all time great, beating past their prime legends who have had a far tougher run of fights than Calzaghe really proves nothing at all. Jones has been done for years and Hopkins, marvellous that he is at his age is pushing 44 years old!
Both Hopkins and Jones have been PVV stars for the past 14-15 years and it has taken it's toll, yet i still give Hopkins a good chance in a rematch and i definately think Kessler could upset Joe balls in a return bout.