Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
The only thing Ricky Hatton could beat Floyd Mayweather at is a drinking contest.
Hatton belongs at 140 because thats where he is natually stronger than most of his opponents and being stronger is a big part of his game because he likes to swarm, hold, hit.
At 147 that part of his game isn't as effective because the guys are bigger and stronger their as it showed with Collazo and Mayweather.
To me though that isn't an excuse to why he lost to Mayweather.
I feel even at 140 Mayweather would put on a very similar performance because he is simply the bigger, smarter, better boxer.
I havent read any of the replies to this thread so i appologise if this has been said already...
I know opposing fighters weights can vary greatly from weigh-in to fight night but the weight itself could not of been an issue here as Both guys must of been weighing the same that night.
Maybe it was a case of Floyd being bigger than Ricky thought. It is apparent that Floyds frame had grown over the years and the mistake could have been made that although Ricky was moving up in weight, he assumed he was facing a naturally smaller man.
I personally dont like to call Floyd a naturally smaller man. Its akin to me saying Ricky Hatton is a natural Middleweight becuase he consumes copious amounts of pies and guiness in between fights
Floyd was, at one point, STARVING himself to malke 130. Fact.
If both guys kept in resonable shape im sure there'd only be a half-stone differential in weight.
Never the less, Knowledge is power....
I believe the real issue is that Floyd had some key experience prior to Hatton in beating Baldomir and Dela Hoya, who were so much bigger in the ring than Hatton.
Dela Hoya Specifically because not only was he bigger but he was, beleive it or not, the 1st guy in a championship fight (maybe any fight) to have a bigger reach than Floyd.
Also Floyd had the knowledge of Hatton's last visit up at WW
Hatton would of stod a much bigger chance of winning IF the fight was made at 140 ONLY when Floyd was campainging at that weight. Floyd wouldn't of been so comfortable and Hattons pressure would of been more telling but Floyd would probably still come through just like he did with Castillo (albeit over 24 rounds)![]()
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
I remember Kerry Kayes saying before the fight when asked how Floyd has managed to gup in weight and stay lean and strong, he said that Floyd was probably starving himself, whereas Ricky does the weight quite easy, also Ricky started out boxing in a weight lifters gym so probably had a head start on the muscle growth, hes probably at his bodys best weight for boxing, whereas Floyd probably never got in to weights until much later and his body has now reached its best potential.
Rickys problem was arrogance, he looked at Floyd and saw a smaller fighter, he fought like he was the stranger man, he didnt try and box and rushed in to get countered, I see him being more effective in a rematch but I think hed still get caught too often and probably stopped.
"There is no point being alive if you cannot do the deadlift."
John Paul Sigmarrsson, 4 time Word's Strongest Man
Hidden Content
I think trying to box Mayweather would have been idiotic on his part given Floyd's huge advantage in boxing skill, speed and reach.
Ricky fought the right fight, he just fought a guy who had an answer to every question Ricky asked of him.
I gained a lot of respect for Ricky in this fight because I thought Floyd would completely dominate him, but Ricky made it fairly compeditive and made Floyd very uneasy at times, which not a lot of people do.
Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
Well Cortez was just enforcing the rules, if you have a reputation for doing something then the refs can only be expected tto watch out for it.
But on the subject of Cortez, after rewatching the fight a few days ago, I noticed Ricky was landing a lot of shots to the back of Floyd's head that weren't called, so I don't think it was biased reffing.
Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
Hidden Content
A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..
Ok i'll have a go.....
Let's get this out of the way first.....Hatton wouldn't beat Mayweather at any weight. And this might not apply directly to Hatton-Mayweather but....
Sometimes a fighter who starts off at a much lower weight can actually be malnutritioned. Not in the sense that millions of people are in third world countries....just in a boxing sense.
The amount of carbohydrates required to enable you to go through a training camp for a period of 10-12 weeks is extortionate. Now if a fighter is training for 3 hours a day and not consuming enough carbohydrates, he will lose a lot of muscle mass......or he will not develop much...if any muscle mass if he is very light to begin with. It could be that Mayweather never previously gave himself the chance to fill out at a more natural weight....because he was under-eating and comfortable at his existing weight. This is something that does happen to fighters....especially those who are very conscious about making weight.
What this fighter will find is, that when he comes to moving up in weight, he finds the transition really easy as an increase in carbohydrate and protein allows him to easily add muscle mass.
Now the advantage this fighter will now possess at is new found weight, will likely be core strength.....especially over a fighter who is definitely fighting above his natural weight. An example of this would be at how Mayweather was stronger than Hatton on the inside.
Now people are going to say that Hatton's natural weight is well over 147. That's correct but how much of that is lean mass? Hardly any. It's practically all fat. So he'll have no advantage.
Anybody remember how much bigger Mayweather looked at the weigh in?
Anyway this theory might not have applied to this fight....because we don't know the ins and outs of Mayweather's training camp/diet etc...
Anyway it comes down to core strength, and just because a fighter was successful at a much lower weight, it doesn't necessarily mean that was his natural weight.
Like i say, may not have been the case with Floyd Mayweather. I'm pretty sure it's the case with Manny though. Maybe we'll see on dec 6th.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks