Quote Originally Posted by Sir Valentine View Post
Yes i know what what per capita means. but that wasn't the question on this Thread. the question was simple and the answer is simple USA/MEXICO. a champion is a champion , real numbers are real numbers, results are results. just because a certain country is bigger doesnt mean its champions and dominance of the sport counts less than the results from smaller countries. just remember the question (What country has produced the best all around fighters during the past 60 years?) NOT (which country has produced the best and most per capita champions). so stop trying to disect and misderect the question just to make Puerto Rico win cause it wont happen. in the records all that counts are the real and hard and cold numbers not the per capita/current population/population growth,boom/estimated population/econonic growth and development or other types of non boxing issues. Yes Puerto Rico and other countries have good boxing traditions but only the USA and MEXICO have GREAT/RICH BOXING histories and traditions. So if the truth hurts oh well u cant please everybody. one must maintain neutrality when answering this question and not let your national pride get in the way. so again hands-down USA and MEXICO
well but you gotta consider size though bro, just cause you consider a dude who wins a belt a champion well yea USA/Mexico take the cake, but shit, we're smaller than most CITIES in the US and yet most the champions, and emphasis on CHAMPION, that come out of PR make a statement and don't just win a belt to lose it in the first defense