Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
If you lived through the seventies, eighties, and nineties, and onwards, you might be a hard sell as to bite into the present crop of the heavyweight division as not being weak.
Likewise, boxing is really missing in talent when a Ted Atlas would lament, and mouth words to the effect that... if boxing is exciting enough, then viewership will be at a maximum. If boxing is at a maximum then the possibility of the Lebron Jameses, choosing boxing over basketball or any other sport for that matter. Is it exciting enough? The very impressionable youth of today always gravitate to the "exciting".
If and when there is that possibility, there is that probability, then boxing may have saved itself.
In hindsight any era can be exciting...people can look back at Lennox Lewis vs Ray Mercer and "oooooo" and "aaaaah" but totally forget that Ray Mercer drew with Marion Wilson and lost to an ancient Larry Holmes before he even fought Lennox who he damn near beat.......we can also look at Oliver McCall and Hasim Rahman and think "Well they had to be pretty good to beat Lennox Lewis" and not ever once stop and think about how McCall was just a club fighter with no boxing skill and 5 losses before the shocking KO of Lewis and how Rahman has ALWAYS been a protected heavyweight.
We can look back to Larry Holmes "battles" with Renoldo Snipes and Tim Witherspoon and never once think "You know Witherspoon and Snipes weren't ready for title shots when they fought Holmes" and still think that Larry is so great to get laid out a couple times by guys who didn't even have 25 pro fights under their belts when he was AT HIS PEAK!
Array
Guys like Snipes, Witherspoon, Carl Williams, et al were hardly green rookies. I base that on how well they performed in the ring at the time. And on how Holmes performed throughout his reign.
As for hindsight, well I ain't gonna try and argue about which of us is using that.![]()
Array
The weakness of the heavyweight division today is on par with a senior citizens' lack of bowel control......
Array
I'm not saying they were nobodies, I am just saying had they been more seasoned they might have done better vs Larry Holmes. When Mike Tyson finally fought Larry Holmes he had 32 fights under his belt.....when Michael Spinks fought Larry he had 27 fights.
And oddly enough those guys did better....call me crazy but I think they did well against Holmes because (not only was Holmes older at this time) but they had more experience
Last edited by El Kabong; 01-14-2009 at 01:37 AM.
Renaldo Snipes 22-0-0....biggest fight before Holmes, split decision wins over Gerrie Coetzee and Eddie Mustafa Muhammad
Tim Witherspoon 15-0-0...biggest fight before Holmes, he got a majority decision vs Snipes
Carl Williams 16-0-0...biggest fight before Holmes, a UD over James Tillis
Marvis Frazier 10-0-0...biggest fight before Holmes, a UD vs Joe Bunger
Ossie Ocasio 13-0-0...biggest fight before Holmes, a SD and UD vs Jimmy Young.
Imagine someone with under 20 fights getting a title shot with Wladimir, he already gets enough crap as it is.
Array
Your post doesn't say prove a whole lot. Like I said, I basing my opinion on how they handled themelves in the ring against Holmes, not on their previous record.
But if you like, we can talk about the tough victories of Hasim Rahman, Tony Thompson, Sultan Ibragimov, Lamon Brewster, Ray Austin, Calvin Brock, 26 lb smaller Chris Byrd, Sam Peter, Not to mention Corrie Sanders, Jameel McCline, Charles Shufford, Francois Botha, and Derek Jefferson.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks