Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: pacman's side of the story

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2091
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Who cares if ODLH said he was still at the top of his game? He clearly wasn't... far from it

    He was weight drained and lethargic... still pretty good, Pac coming up in weight, can't take too much away from that... but he needs to wake up and put it a bit more into perspective.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1516
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    I just watched Pacquiao-De La Hoya and Mayweather-De La Hoya this morning, he looked pretty much the same, but Pacquiao kept moving, and while Floyd was able to land his jab almost at will, Pacquiao was able to land the much harder left cross at all. There is no version of De La Hoya that would have been able to deal wtih what Pacquiao brought. He didn't look bad at all against Forbes, he looked good against Mayorga and Mayweather. Pacquiao had the right style, the right skills, and the right physical abilities to knock Oscar out IMO at any point in his career.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    9,493
    Mentioned
    82 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1368
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    He didn't look bad at all against Forbes, he looked good against Mayorga and Mayweather. Pacquiao had the right style, the right skills, and the right physical abilities to knock Oscar out IMO at any point in his career.

    Gotta disagree there

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    324
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1511
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Oscar in his prime days was more of a mover. As he got older he started moving his head less and started blocking punches with his forearms. Watch his fight with Gatti and then watch him vs. Forbes. He is much more stiff now and he is clearly not the same as he was. Prime Oscar would have troubled Manny with his quickness on his feet and movement. Prime for prime its a tough call.
    Only Forum Amature With Well Over 2000 Posts!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Boom Boom View Post
    Oscar in his prime days was more of a mover. As he got older he started moving his head less and started blocking punches with his forearms. Watch his fight with Gatti and then watch him vs. Forbes. He is much more stiff now and he is clearly not the same as he was. Prime Oscar would have troubled Manny with his quickness on his feet and movement. Prime for prime its a tough call.
    i dont think oscar is a mover in his prime days. he was more of a bouncer. he bounces on his toes a lot but he is not a laterall mover. but then he always had stamina problems which made him stop bouncing. if you watch the quartey odlh fight. the only times he caugh bazooka was when he is on his toes. but for the most part of that fight bazooka had him on the defensive coz he always ran out of steam. too bad ike didnt capitalize and finish him.
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    He didn't look bad at all against Forbes, he looked good against Mayorga and Mayweather. Pacquiao had the right style, the right skills, and the right physical abilities to knock Oscar out IMO at any point in his career.

    Gotta disagree there

    care to elaborate? we wanna know what you think./
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,736
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1249
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    He didn't look bad at all against Forbes, he looked good against Mayorga and Mayweather. Pacquiao had the right style, the right skills, and the right physical abilities to knock Oscar out IMO at any point in his career.

    Gotta disagree there

    care to elaborate? we wanna know what you think./
    Watch ANY fight of Oscar in his prime. A few examples: Oscar vs Trinidad, Oscar vs Quartey, Oscar vs Gonzalez, Oscar vs Hopkins (eventhough he lost, he still looked sharp), Oscar vs Chavez, etc.. Look at the speed of his combinations, his piercing jab, that left hook, the vicious body punches, those uppercuts, etc.

    Yes, Pac did have the right tools...against an old passed-his-prime ODLH. Something that he and his team even mentioned during interviews.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2091
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    I just watched Pacquiao-De La Hoya and Mayweather-De La Hoya this morning, he looked pretty much the same, but Pacquiao kept moving, and while Floyd was able to land his jab almost at will, Pacquiao was able to land the much harder left cross at all. There is no version of De La Hoya that would have been able to deal wtih what Pacquiao brought. He didn't look bad at all against Forbes, he looked good against Mayorga and Mayweather. Pacquiao had the right style, the right skills, and the right physical abilities to knock Oscar out IMO at any point in his career.
    ODLH lacked any sort of explosiveness or work rate... he circled basically one way around the ring the whole entire fight. Legs seemed to have failed him... he didn't use them at all.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    1,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1425
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Who cares if ODLH said he was still at the top of his game? He clearly wasn't... far from it

    He was weight drained and lethargic... still pretty good, Pac coming up in weight, can't take too much away from that... but he needs to wake up and put it a bit more into perspective.
    His comments refferred to the situation BEFORE the fight. No critic/fan/'expert' gave PAc a shot, yet he took on such an apparent challenge for a derisory split, so now he rightly expects a little more respect at the negotiating table.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Bomp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Who cares if ODLH said he was still at the top of his game? He clearly wasn't... far from it

    He was weight drained and lethargic... still pretty good, Pac coming up in weight, can't take too much away from that... but he needs to wake up and put it a bit more into perspective.
    His comments refferred to the situation BEFORE the fight. No critic/fan/'expert' gave PAc a shot, yet he took on such an apparent challenge for a derisory split, so now he rightly expects a little more respect at the negotiating table.
    That's a bit strong, Bomp.

    He had an $11 million guarantee.. a career high payday by miles. And was coming off a terrible PPV showing against Diaz - 200,000 - plus shifted only 8,000 of 12,000 tickets.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1093
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bomp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Who cares if ODLH said he was still at the top of his game? He clearly wasn't... far from it

    He was weight drained and lethargic... still pretty good, Pac coming up in weight, can't take too much away from that... but he needs to wake up and put it a bit more into perspective.
    His comments refferred to the situation BEFORE the fight. No critic/fan/'expert' gave PAc a shot, yet he took on such an apparent challenge for a derisory split, so now he rightly expects a little more respect at the negotiating table.
    That's a bit strong, Bomp.

    He had an $11 million guarantee.. a career high payday by miles. And was coming off a terrible PPV showing against Diaz - 200,000 - plus shifted only 8,000 of 12,000 tickets.
    i think bomp is right for using a strong word. 68-32 split for odlh. he was the bigger guy, the bigger puncher, he was much more skilled. everyone was thinking that pac would get koed in that fight. yet odlh wont even give pac a 65-35 split despite his advantages. if it so happend that odlh knocked pac out to la la land, dont you think its more insulting to get a 32% share and get blasted? talking about adding insult to injury.
    "speed is the essence of war"
    sun tzu-art of war

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bomp View Post

    His comments refferred to the situation BEFORE the fight. No critic/fan/'expert' gave PAc a shot, yet he took on such an apparent challenge for a derisory split, so now he rightly expects a little more respect at the negotiating table.
    That's a bit strong, Bomp.

    He had an $11 million guarantee.. a career high payday by miles. And was coming off a terrible PPV showing against Diaz - 200,000 - plus shifted only 8,000 of 12,000 tickets.
    i think bomp is right for using a strong word. 68-32 split for odlh. he was the bigger guy, the bigger puncher, he was much more skilled. everyone was thinking that pac would get koed in that fight. yet odlh wont even give pac a 65-35 split despite his advantages. if it so happend that odlh knocked pac out to la la land, dont you think its more insulting to get a 32% share and get blasted? talking about adding insult to injury.
    The fighter that generates the MOST money gets the bigger cut. How is that insulting to anyone?

    Oscar can sell a million PPVs fighting mickey mouse. Pac can't. So why would Pac get anywhere NEAR Oscar's money? Being the best fighter or most skilled or P4P no.1 means virtually nothing.

    Pac's best paydays were in $2 million range. He then gets $11 million+ for fighting Oscar. What's the problem? The prize against Oscar is the MONEY. That's why EVERYONE wants to fight him.

    And Pac hit the jackpot by winning the fight. He can now demand an even BIGGER payday against another of boxings highest earning STARS.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    1,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1425
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post

    That's a bit strong, Bomp.

    He had an $11 million guarantee.. a career high payday by miles. And was coming off a terrible PPV showing against Diaz - 200,000 - plus shifted only 8,000 of 12,000 tickets.
    i think bomp is right for using a strong word. 68-32 split for odlh. he was the bigger guy, the bigger puncher, he was much more skilled. everyone was thinking that pac would get koed in that fight. yet odlh wont even give pac a 65-35 split despite his advantages. if it so happend that odlh knocked pac out to la la land, dont you think its more insulting to get a 32% share and get blasted? talking about adding insult to injury.
    The fighter that generates the MOST money gets the bigger cut. How is that insulting to anyone?

    Oscar can sell a million PPVs fighting mickey mouse. Pac can't. So why would Pac get anywhere NEAR Oscar's money? Being the best fighter or most skilled or P4P no.1 means virtually nothing.

    Pac's best paydays were in $2 million range. He then gets $11 million+ for fighting Oscar. What's the problem? The prize against Oscar is the MONEY. That's why EVERYONE wants to fight him.

    And Pac hit the jackpot by winning the fight. He can now demand an even BIGGER payday against another of boxings highest earning STARS.
    I agree that being the primary money generator in a fight must be taken into consideration. But like your final sentence says, Pac has earned his negotiating position the hard way, after ODLH-Ricky got shelved after the pasting from Floyd.

    My argument is against the Pac trasher's who write him off as a ducker when all he wanted was a little extra negotiation.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Bomp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by josef4334 View Post

    i think bomp is right for using a strong word. 68-32 split for odlh. he was the bigger guy, the bigger puncher, he was much more skilled. everyone was thinking that pac would get koed in that fight. yet odlh wont even give pac a 65-35 split despite his advantages. if it so happend that odlh knocked pac out to la la land, dont you think its more insulting to get a 32% share and get blasted? talking about adding insult to injury.
    The fighter that generates the MOST money gets the bigger cut. How is that insulting to anyone?

    Oscar can sell a million PPVs fighting mickey mouse. Pac can't. So why would Pac get anywhere NEAR Oscar's money? Being the best fighter or most skilled or P4P no.1 means virtually nothing.

    Pac's best paydays were in $2 million range. He then gets $11 million+ for fighting Oscar. What's the problem? The prize against Oscar is the MONEY. That's why EVERYONE wants to fight him.

    And Pac hit the jackpot by winning the fight. He can now demand an even BIGGER payday against another of boxings highest earning STARS.
    I agree that being the primary money generator in a fight must be taken into consideration. But like your final sentence says, Pac has earned his negotiating position the hard way, after ODLH-Ricky got shelved after the pasting from Floyd.

    My argument is against the Pac trasher's who write him off as a ducker when all he wanted was a little extra negotiation.
    I didn't think many people were serious about Pac ducking the fight.. i guess some were

    Fans arguing about which multi-millionaire fighter deserves the bigger cut of their next multi-million dollar payday is totally ridiculous anyway
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2091
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: pacman's side of the story

    Quote Originally Posted by Bomp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
    Who cares if ODLH said he was still at the top of his game? He clearly wasn't... far from it

    He was weight drained and lethargic... still pretty good, Pac coming up in weight, can't take too much away from that... but he needs to wake up and put it a bit more into perspective.
    His comments refferred to the situation BEFORE the fight. No critic/fan/'expert' gave PAc a shot, yet he took on such an apparent challenge for a derisory split, so now he rightly expects a little more respect at the negotiating table.
    He is now negotiating after the fight, we all witnessed how it went down and the only way for him to rate himself is from that... not what ODLH said before the fight. What else was Oscar supposed to say going into the bout?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-18-2008, 11:25 AM
  2. The better side of Mayweather
    By C-Lo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-03-2008, 03:07 AM
  3. The Myth of Side-to-Side Movement
    By greynotsoold in forum Important / Useful Posts
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-26-2007, 01:57 AM
  4. Reflexes a-side, what is the best defence
    By Taeth in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 05:47 AM
  5. PacMan's whirlwind life
    By benjamming554 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-14-2007, 08:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing