Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    dartford kent
    Posts
    378
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    977
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Jennings was never expected to win this anyway. It was a big step up for him and it showed. The guy deserves credit for giving it a go though. He's obviously no world beater, but very few are. Cotto got his win, no need to gloat over Jennings though. He was in over his head and could have stayed down early, but got up and was sensible to stop when he did. Leave it at that, I say.
    He tried his best, Mike was only their to make Cotto look good (from a promoters point of few) , he got up for more, the lad came up short like we all expected but no shame in loosing to Cotto.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2083
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Danny is such a fucking nut hugger... look at him going off and gloating in this thread.

    He wanted to see Cotto beat up a Cherry picked opponent for a few more rounds?...

    Did you think you'd be able to finish off that box of Kleenex?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Dean Duke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Jennings was never expected to win this anyway. It was a big step up for him and it showed. The guy deserves credit for giving it a go though. He's obviously no world beater, but very few are. Cotto got his win, no need to gloat over Jennings though. He was in over his head and could have stayed down early, but got up and was sensible to stop when he did. Leave it at that, I say.
    He tried his best, Mike was only their to make Cotto look good (from a promoters point of few) , he got up for more, the lad came up short like we all expected but no shame in loosing to Cotto.
    Exactly. I think it was more a case of people wishing him well rather than expecting a win. Cotto looked really solid and Jennings stayed in there as long as he could.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. My take on Cotto - Jennings
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-16-2009, 05:13 AM
  2. Cotto - Jennings?
    By CFH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 05:27 PM
  3. Mick Jennings
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-21-2007, 05:01 PM
  4. Jennings v Minter??????????
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2007, 10:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing