Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1873
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Well done Cotto, he looked very well strong last night and he knew exactly how to get to Jennings. Jennings tried his best but when he could barely land his jab and not follow it up with anything it was always going to only end with Cotto stopping him. Jennings style comes from the outside and against opposition not on the elite level it works very well as shown in all of Jennings other fights. I think he showed a lot of heart carrying on and nobody can deny that. Cotto proved he was another level and I hope we can see him in some good fight this year.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Like a Shane rematch think it could of gone either way last time and think Shane can finish the job this time i be rooting for him and as for Margrito well while know this march if he while ever fight again once they annouce what was in his gloves atleast i think it was march when they annoce it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3165
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    I really wish Cotto well especially if that beating Margarito gave him was with loaded wraps, but its a good 1st step to be back in the winners circle..

    BUT the true test for Cotto will be when he gets cracked by a good puncher and see if all the demons from the margarito fight dont comeback. As mentioned Jennings was there to boost Cotto's confidence and marketability again, that dude couldnt break an egg, so Miguel knew there was no danger in getting clipped..

    Guys like Mosley, Berto and Cintron can hit pretty damn hard and make your life hell.

    But lets no overrate this win, congrats Miguel you made a good 1st step back

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3133
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1402
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Id actully like to see Cotto/Collazo would be an intresting matchup, much rather that than him fight Cintron.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

    If that impresses Danny then so be it

  7. #7
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

    If that impresses Danny then so be it

    That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    818
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1191
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Danny, where you and other fan boys differ is that you are so unashamedly biased you actually lose all credibilty. We shoukl ignore your rants completely as they never give any reasonkng of substance.

    Nobody on the planet, includimg Jenninmgs' own Mother, thought Jennings would win. Gloating about the obvious is just stupid
    "He was convulsing on the floor like an infantile retard"

    - Mike Tyson Hidden Content

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny_G View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

    If that impresses Danny then so be it

    That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.
    Come on now. I've never said Jennings would do well. I said he ain't no Gary Lockett and wont embarass himself. And he didn't. He gave his all and fought his heart out. And since when have I criticised Cotto for fighting lesser opponents ? And what has Ricky Hatton got to do with anything, when did I bring him up in this thread ? You constantly bang on about how Margarito cheated in the Cotto fight but says who ? You got no damn evidence whatsoever. Fact is Cotto got knocked the fuck out. And you cant handle it. Your just one biased, bitter guy Danny when it comes to Cotto.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. My take on Cotto - Jennings
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-16-2009, 05:13 AM
  2. Cotto - Jennings?
    By CFH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 05:27 PM
  3. Mick Jennings
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-21-2007, 05:01 PM
  4. Jennings v Minter??????????
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2007, 10:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing