Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 68

Thread: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3179
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    I really wish Cotto well especially if that beating Margarito gave him was with loaded wraps, but its a good 1st step to be back in the winners circle..

    BUT the true test for Cotto will be when he gets cracked by a good puncher and see if all the demons from the margarito fight dont comeback. As mentioned Jennings was there to boost Cotto's confidence and marketability again, that dude couldnt break an egg, so Miguel knew there was no danger in getting clipped..

    Guys like Mosley, Berto and Cintron can hit pretty damn hard and make your life hell.

    But lets no overrate this win, congrats Miguel you made a good 1st step back

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3147
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Id actully like to see Cotto/Collazo would be an intresting matchup, much rather that than him fight Cintron.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

    If that impresses Danny then so be it

  5. #5
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

    If that impresses Danny then so be it

    That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    818
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1205
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Danny, where you and other fan boys differ is that you are so unashamedly biased you actually lose all credibilty. We shoukl ignore your rants completely as they never give any reasonkng of substance.

    Nobody on the planet, includimg Jenninmgs' own Mother, thought Jennings would win. Gloating about the obvious is just stupid
    "He was convulsing on the floor like an infantile retard"

    - Mike Tyson Hidden Content

  7. #7
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Conrad View Post
    Danny, where you and other fan boys differ is that you are so unashamedly biased you actually lose all credibilty. We shoukl ignore your rants completely as they never give any reasonkng of substance.

    Nobody on the planet, includimg Jenninmgs' own Mother, thought Jennings would win. Gloating about the obvious is just stupid
    I hate to say this but there were plenty of people who thought Cotto was done after getting the plaster beat down of his life but.... Oooops.. I guess he is not done. Plenty of people thought Jennings was going to shock the world You don't think Jennings own mom thought he would win? Why did she let him cross the pond then? lol I wont attack you, I will let you guys attack me today because attacking me personally is all you monkeys have left. I will be gloating again when PacMan whips little Ricky and then your monkey ass will really hate me Oh I can't wait. weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    818
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1205
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny_G View Post
    I wont attack you,
    If that's the case bud why did you neg rep me?

    I've never neg repped anyone on here, even Moono and I wont start with you despite your neg rep to me.

    The stupid thing about this whole thing is you seem to think everyone on here is against Cotto!! I think you'll find that pretty much everybody here is a Cotto fan, myself included.

    The irony of your Cotto nut hugging is that it actually makes people associate what they feel for you with Cotto.

    Do yourself (and Cotto) a favour and tone it down. Despite what you found on another forum pretty much everybody knew Jennings would lose. The Uk may not have much to offer at WW but I'm sure we could turn round and say the same about the US and LWW/SMW/LHW/CW etc etc...
    "He was convulsing on the floor like an infantile retard"

    - Mike Tyson Hidden Content

  9. #9
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Conrad View Post
    Danny, where you and other fan boys differ is that you are so unashamedly biased you actually lose all credibilty. We shoukl ignore your rants completely as they never give any reasonkng of substance.

    Nobody on the planet, includimg Jenninmgs' own Mother, thought Jennings would win. Gloating about the obvious is just stupid

    Oooppss







    I can find these all day long. Should I look on this forum too or should we just leave it at that?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    21,453
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2248
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny_G View Post
    I can find these all day long. Should I look on this forum too or should we just leave it at that?
    find some on this forum... prob wont be as easy... but then i guess that is why you screen shot that kiddies board in the first place

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by Danny_G View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

    Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
    LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

    If that impresses Danny then so be it

    That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.
    Come on now. I've never said Jennings would do well. I said he ain't no Gary Lockett and wont embarass himself. And he didn't. He gave his all and fought his heart out. And since when have I criticised Cotto for fighting lesser opponents ? And what has Ricky Hatton got to do with anything, when did I bring him up in this thread ? You constantly bang on about how Margarito cheated in the Cotto fight but says who ? You got no damn evidence whatsoever. Fact is Cotto got knocked the fuck out. And you cant handle it. Your just one biased, bitter guy Danny when it comes to Cotto.

  12. #12
    SigmaMu Guest

    Default Re: Is Jennings the best you all have at 147? WTF!

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Danny_G View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post

    LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

    If that impresses Danny then so be it

    That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.
    Come on now. I've never said Jennings would do well. I said he ain't no Gary Lockett and wont embarass himself. And he didn't. He gave his all and fought his heart out. And since when have I criticised Cotto for fighting lesser opponents ? And what has Ricky Hatton got to do with anything, when did I bring him up in this thread ? You constantly bang on about how Margarito cheated in the Cotto fight but says who ? You got no damn evidence whatsoever. Fact is Cotto got knocked the fuck out. And you cant handle it. Your just one biased, bitter guy Danny when it comes to Cotto.
    Damn you are doing more running than Jennings is

    Run Lefty Run!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. My take on Cotto - Jennings
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-16-2009, 05:13 AM
  2. Cotto - Jennings?
    By CFH in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 11-10-2008, 05:27 PM
  3. Mick Jennings
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-21-2007, 05:01 PM
  4. Jennings v Minter??????????
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2007, 10:59 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing