Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Gloating about Cotto's win over Jennings is the equivalent of calling a Poodle a pussy for getting killed by a Pit Bull. Fact.

Also.. Hatton has beaten Collazo for the WBA title at 147. A fight between Jennings and Hatton would be laughable and NEVER even be considered in Britain. Which sums up the value of Cotto's win
LMAO it is comical Danny G made up over Cotto beating Jennnings. A guy who he has seen box once and even Diane admitted she has never seen box. A guy who got beat by Young Mutley and his best win is against Ross Minter.

If that impresses Danny then so be it

That is what I was looking for. I was waiting to see you change your tune. I told you Jennings sucked. You said Jennings was for real and that he was going to do well against Cotto I only needed to see this bum once to know he sucked. You and Chino are always saying Cotto sucks against lesser opponents and if that is the case then Jennings is not even a lesser opponent then right? I hate to burst your little bubble here but Hatton did not beat Collazo at 147. That was a gift Hatton got and was chased back down to 140 and where PACMAN is going to eat up Hatton You and a few other clowns were saying Cotto was shot and that he would not be the same after the PlasterGate Well, you continue to be wrong and I am here to remind you of that fact.