Even if it only till the outcome of Pac/Hatton JMM is PFP#1

[Spicoli]

I officially re-hate p4p lists.Pure subjectivity,opinion & interpretation.Pick who you think is the better fighter,better resume/accomplishments,skillset & ring generalship...thats your p4p.Marquez is mine.Gets away from focus on divisions and who is best?I'm surprised no one is making a case for Floyd.I mean,I wouldn't but with so much hype undoubtedly coming our way should Pacquiao emerge victorious vs. Hatton,where would he rank with an announced return,taking into account the inactivity?And why would Marquez call him out,knowing hes 'retired' ,does he know something we don't?I'm all over the place,just remembered I dislike the p4p lists .

The non Ring rankings are, and that's why they have no credibility, the Ring Rankings are about as fair and accurate as you can realistically get however.

Its called the Bible of Boxing,ok.But I'm not about to fall at the altar and sing hymes to Oscar & Nat Fleisher.I have the utmost respect for Its history and its endeavorers to better the sport and give the fans a unified front,but Ive always had issues with p4p.Prior to Shane Smashing Margarito to bits,Tony was #6...ahead of Rafa Marquez.Wrap-gate aside...I still like Tony but I honestly and respectfully dont think he should have been that high p4p.It all comes down to skills for me.Damn Bilbo...now ya have me talking p4p .Good read those last couple of pages guys.

Damn...now you went and edited.Its not subjectivity at all Bilbs.Regardless of Pacs narrow win...I do in fact see & believe Marquez to be the better all around skilled fighter...forward and back.It makes perfect sense to me.