Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 113

Thread: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

Share/Bookmark
  1. #76
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    you said it "experts", hell i'm still waiting for this comeback from Hamed that Fightnews kept rambling on about, buuuuut i think that this is as far as this argument goes, cause honestly dude, your love for Pacquiao has you completely blinded with real facts, shit if Boxrec tells you that allowing Pacquiao to take you up the ass would prevent cancer, you'd gladly bend over lol
    So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
    .
    no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" Marquez
    Well dude... It's their list being viewed by millions of people while your list might end up in a garbage can together with other shits... Just think about that dude...
    .

  2. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1347
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


    After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

    Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

    Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

    If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

    Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?
    Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
    Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.

  3. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1347
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
    .
    no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" Marquez
    Well dude... It's their list being viewed by millions of people while your list might end up in a garbage can together with other shits... Just think about that dude...
    .
    and the same way you just discredited their oh so holy list, by saying they're not "experts", get a fucking opinion and stand by it you nutsucking coward lol decide do you agree with Boxrec fully? or just pick out what you wanna hear and then blow off the rest, like eagle said, if Boxrec's listing is so accurate by putting Pacquiao at #1 at 140, than i guess their putting Pacquiao at #5 for p4p has to make sense as well to you

  4. #79
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


    After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

    Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

    Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

    If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

    Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?
    Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
    Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.
    Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

    If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM

  5. #80
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1679
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


    After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

    Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

    Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

    If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

    Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?
    Thats complete and utter bullshit. Saddoboxer agrees that Pac is #1 at 140 and used Boxrec's rankings to back up his argument. Yet the same site has Manny ranked #5 P4P which im sure he wont agree with. He wont admit that tho and dodges the issue like a dumbass cos he knows if he admits Boxrec were wrong on their P4P rankings it kills their other rankings credibility. If u think anything else your deluded.

  6. #81
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1347
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    What about the boxing writers and "experts" at FightNews and BoxRec?? They're the ones who established these rankings...
    .
    Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.
    Boxrec rankings are not done by experts...
    .
    like i said nutthugger make up your mind

  7. #82
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    So you agree it's not only me... There are many boxing writers and "experts" out there who consider PAC as the no. 1 at 140 right now... How much more after PAC demolish Hatton on May 2....
    .
    no dude i don't agree with you, it's something called sarcasm, Pacquiao isn't #1 in anything besides on some peoples p4p lists, i personally have him as #2 , he's not the top dog in any division, hasn't been since he left 130, hell wasn't even at 130 anymore cause IMO my p4p #1 pick, won the fight, and that being Juan Manuel "Pacman Chaser" Marquez
    JMM is chasing Pac coz he knows he was defeated by Pac. For short, he's insecure with his status. If he's not, why chase Pac?

    Pac is still p4p numero uno and JMM is just bitter with losing to Pac just as many of his fans are. FACT.
    PAC already gave JMM 2 chances... but JMM can't convincingly defeat PAC... You can't really criticize PAC if he won't give JMM a 3rd chance... Also PAC is going for big fights before he retires... He has one more fight left after Hatton... Why give it to JMM when there's still PBF, Cotto, Mosley, etc. out there... We already seen a PAC-JMM fight 2 times already and what we saw on both occassions was JMM kissing the canvass... I'm tired of seeing JMM with his butt on the canvass...
    .

  8. #83
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,805
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1407
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    I have Manny #1 at 135. Here are my rankings at 140:

    Jr. Welterweight (140 lbs)
    1. Ricky Hatton
    2. Juan Urango
    3. Kendall Holt
    4.Andreas Kotelnik
    5. Timothy Bradley
    6. Joan Guzman
    7. Ricardo Torres
    8. Marcos Maidana
    9. Junior Witter
    10.Randall Bailey
    11.Herman Ngoudjo
    12.Paul Malignaggi
    13. Lamont Peterson
    14. Mike Arnaoutis
    15. Devon Alexander

    “If you want loyalty, buy a dog.” Ricky Hatton





  9. #84
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1347
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.


    After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.

    Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.

    Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.

    If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.

    Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?
    Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
    Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.
    Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

    If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM
    unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy

  10. #85
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

    Those same experts that have Manny P4P #5 at boxrec. U do agree with them right? A simple yes or no dweeb.
    Boxrec rankings are not done by experts...
    .
    like i said nutthugger make up your mind
    Boxrec rankings are done by computers...
    .

  11. #86
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1679
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    Boxrec rankings are not done by experts...
    .
    like i said nutthugger make up your mind
    Boxrec rankings are done by computers...
    .
    Do u agree with the Boxrec computers that Manny is P4P #5 Rainman? Answer or are u too scared Everybody already thinks your a fool so answering wont change much.

  12. #87
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Bruce Leroy, what has Pacquiao done to make him "undoubtedly" p4p #1? beat the ever so lame David Diaz, and an old, weight drained, shot De La Hoya
    Marquez beat the top 2 fighters at light weight back to back, and i'm pretty sure that if no one steps up to fight him he'll take on the next tough opponent at 140, be it Campbell, Arnaoutis, Ortiz, Holt, Bradley, Malignaggi, Urango, etc.
    Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

    If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM
    unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy
    If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.

  13. #88
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1347
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post

    Don't call me Bruce Leroy. My real name is brucelee. You ask the certified boxing experts in Yahoo, Ring and other boxing writers' organizations.

    If you don't know why he's undoubtedly pound for pound number1 then you must be new to boxing or you must be sleeping with JMM
    unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy
    If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.
    why? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover

  14. #89
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,574
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1503
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    unlike you buddy i don't hug on a fighters nuts, or take it up my ass like you and Saddoboxer so clearly do for Pacquiao, and no bud boxing is a part of my culture, so i think you need to rewatch the tapes Bruce Leroy
    If boxing is part of your culture then your parents, grandparents, etc. must be so dismayed with your lack of boxing knowledge.
    why? because my boxing knowledge isn't centered on Pacquiao? dude go beat off to your Ring Mags with Pacs face on the cover
    and your name is "el terrible morales". at least I haven't named myself after Pac.

  15. #90
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    like i said nutthugger make up your mind
    Boxrec rankings are done by computers...
    .
    Do u agree with the Boxrec computers that Manny is P4P #5 Rainman? Answer or are u too scared Everybody already thinks your a fool so answering wont change much.
    This is one occasion that humans (FightNews) and computers (BoxRec) are in agreement that boxer Manny Pacquiao is the no. 1 man at 140 division...
    .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is Showtime Paying Fightnews?
    By BoxingGorilla in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-28-2008, 02:47 PM
  2. The latest from Fightnews...
    By napoleon336 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-03-2008, 08:15 PM
  3. A MUST READ FOR THOSE WHO CHECK UP ON FIGHTNEWS.COM!!!!!
    By frozensolid_702 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-06-2006, 04:12 AM
  4. fightnews.com: Oscar not retiring!!!
    By tarverthewoofer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-22-2006, 04:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing