Why does it matter the reasons behind Taylor's losses? He lost. That's it. You cite Taylor's stamina in the first fight and determination and strategy or courage (not sure which) in the second fight as the reasons Taylor lost. However, stamina, determination, courage, and strategy are factors that contribute to making a boxer bad, good, or great. Taylor's stamina, determination, and strategy are not on par with Pavlik. Give Pavlik his due. Not only did he knock him out in highlight-reel fashion the first time around, but he outboxed him the second time. Moreover, the reason Taylor was tentative in the second fight is because he felt Pavlik's power the first time around. That'll do it. I like Taylor and picked him to beat Froch. But, at 160, Pavlik has his number.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks