Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 42

Thread: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    so what (active) ELITE fighter has Manny beaten of late to be considered elite?
    What elites were out there for him to beat besides Marquez?
    Who cares, Manny's been elite for a long time.
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post

    What elites were out there for him to beat besides Marquez?
    Who cares, Manny's been elite for a long time.
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit
    so you're considering Juan Diaz as elite fighter eventhough hes got his ass handed to him by active elite fighters like Campbell and Marquez?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Juan Diaz reminds of Joe Frazier without the footspeed or power... or head movement, but he keeps his hands higher to compensate.
    So... he looks... anything like him... at all?
    Frazier and he throw punches nothing alike IMO. When have we seen Baby Bull throw 7 left hooks in a row?
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1121
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    I am really shocked at how people perceive Juan Diaz. Granted, he is not a knockout artist, but I would never say he lacks power. It's not shoe shin he's serving out there. Listen to Manny Stewart's commentary when he fought JMM. "Diaz was sitting on his punches, using his legs, and landing big shots". I thought for the first tiem Diaz' punches were stronger than ever after the first couple rounds. I do not think that it's Diaz power that we were missing, it was JMM's chin is cast iron. The guy is impossible to hurt.
    Diaz still has a great career ahead of him. He is fighting guys who are not easy to knockout, guys who he should be outboxing, really, and he's had a lot of success, despite coming up short 2x in his career. I really give credit to Campbell and JMM, rather than discredit J. Diaz.

    Aside: It's too bad His little bro (R.Marquez) had to be matched up with his elite Izzy. He would be viewed as just as good a fighter, but he's had to take MUCH harder shots than JMM with his Elite matchup... And yes, of course Pacman is Elite. DUH!
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1197
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    so what (active) ELITE fighter has Manny beaten of late to be considered elite?
    What elites were out there for him to beat besides Marquez?
    Who cares, Manny's been elite for a long time.
    I know that, I was responding to ElTerrible who was asking who elite manny fought lately, so I was asking who else was there for him to fight that was considered elite.
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by Killa From Manila View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post

    Who cares, Manny's been elite for a long time.
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit
    so you're considering Juan Diaz as elite fighter eventhough hes got his ass handed to him by active elite fighters like Campbell and Marquez?
    in anything that i wrote did i say i considered Diaz an elite fighter? no, but i do consider Hatton right now one of the elite fighters out there, and i don't even really like Hatton

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Killa From Manila View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit
    so you're considering Juan Diaz as elite fighter eventhough hes got his ass handed to him by active elite fighters like Campbell and Marquez?
    in anything that i wrote did i say i considered Diaz an elite fighter? no, but i do consider Hatton right now one of the elite fighters out there, and i don't even really like Hatton
    Aight, fair enough. I was gonna say "Geez! Jaca is elite fighter then, coz he was very competive against Marquez, but ended up getting KTFO just like Diaz."

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1498
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post

    What elites were out there for him to beat besides Marquez?
    Who cares, Manny's been elite for a long time.
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit
    So Manny beating Marquez, Barrera, Dela Hoya, and Morales isnt' considered beating elites?

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post

    Who cares, Manny's been elite for a long time.
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit
    So Manny beating Marquez, Barrera, Dela Hoya, and Morales isnt' considered beating elites?
    beating a shot Morales and De La Hoya no, Barrera yes, and Marquez i felt he won both fights not Manny

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit
    So Manny beating Marquez, Barrera, Dela Hoya, and Morales isnt' considered beating elites?
    beating a shot Morales and De La Hoya no, Barrera yes, and Marquez i felt he won both fights not Manny
    Well, that's your opinion.

    The debates on who won both Pac-JMM fights will just go on and on and on and on...

    But on the latest Ring Mag issue, JMM seems to admitted he never defeated Pac (check out my sig).

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by Killa From Manila View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post

    So Manny beating Marquez, Barrera, Dela Hoya, and Morales isnt' considered beating elites?
    beating a shot Morales and De La Hoya no, Barrera yes, and Marquez i felt he won both fights not Manny
    Well, that's your opinion.

    The debates on who won both Pac-JMM fights will just go on and on and on and on...

    But on the latest Ring Mag issue, JMM seems to admitted he never defeated Pac (check out my sig).
    no doubt, they're just those types of fights that will always be disputed on who actually won, like Hagler/Leonard, DLH/Trinidad, etc.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1498
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    that's what i was trying to say, you don't have to beat elite to be elite, you pick up enough meaningful wins against good world class opposition and you should be considered an elite fighter, hence the p4p list, and i'm not disputing the fact that Pacquiao should be considered elite cause he should, only thing is that the theory of "to be elite you have to beat (active) elite" is complete bullshit
    So Manny beating Marquez, Barrera, Dela Hoya, and Morales isnt' considered beating elites?
    beating a shot Morales and De La Hoya no, Barrera yes, and Marquez i felt he won both fights not Manny
    The only people that think Marquez won the second fight are delusional, he didn't even win without the knockdown, with it there is no way he won that fight. Need further evidence of who was better watch Marquez-Barrear then Pacquiao-Barrera, in the first fight both guys seem virtually equal, while in the second fihgt consisting of Pacquiao and Barrera, Pacquiao wins handily and doesn't even really step on the gas.

    Morales wasn't shot in their first fight and Manny almost beat him there and he wasn't half as good as he is now.

    Also was that the same shot Oscar De La Hoya who looked good against Mayweather and Steve Forbes? I am not saying he was what, he once was maybe even when he faced Floyd, but it was Pacquiao's greatness not De La Hoya's decline that was the reason he got his ass handed to him. Marquez wouldn't have been able to do that.

    Even if you had Pacquiao losing both fights to Marquez which due to terrible scoring, they would have still had to have been extremely close fights(within a round or two) and the second one even without the knockdown scored would have had to been very close.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    [quote=Taeth;715012]
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post

    So Manny beating Marquez, Barrera, Dela Hoya, and Morales isnt' considered beating elites?
    beating a shot Morales and De La Hoya no, Barrera yes, and Marquez i felt he won both fights not Manny
    The only people that think Marquez won the second fight are delusional, he didn't even win without the knockdown, with it there is no way he won that fight. Need further evidence of who was better watch Marquez-Barrear then Pacquiao-Barrera, in the first fight both guys seem virtually equal, while in the second fihgt consisting of Pacquiao and Barrera, Pacquiao wins handily and doesn't even really step on the gas.
    Barrera was giving Pacquiao fits in the first fight until the later rounds, IMO he could have taken him out if he would have pressured more, Manny gets the credit that he came back and stopped him
    Morales wasn't shot in their first fight and Manny almost beat him there and he wasn't half as good as he is now.
    Morales won 115-113 UD, and could have easily won 116-112 in the first fight, he gave away the last round, after dominating the 11th, and hello he lost to Raheem the very next fight, and i know you're not trying to say that Raheem is overall better than Morales cause if you are it proves you're an biased ass
    Also was that the same shot Oscar De La Hoya who looked good against Mayweather and Steve Forbes? I am not saying he was what, he once was maybe even when he faced Floyd, but it was Pacquiao's greatness not De La Hoya's decline that was the reason he got his ass handed to him. Marquez wouldn't have been able to do that.
    you're the first person to actually say DLH looked good against Forbes shit that's the first fight i've seen the winner win by shut out and still look like crap, and honestly anyone at 147,140,135 with a pulse would have beaten DLH that night, maybe not as badly as Pac did but Hatton IMO would have beat him worse
    Even if you had Pacquiao losing both fights to Marquez which due to terrible scoring, they would have still had to have been extremely close fights(within a round or two) and the second one even without the knockdown scored would have had to been very close.
    shows just how biased you are in fights that you have the nerve to say that neither Pac/Marquez fights were close, Manny didn't in anyway dominate ANY part of the fights aside from maybe the first round in the first fight, how the hell would Marquez of lost in the rematch regardless of the knockdown, when he's won more rounds in both fights than Manny, take the semen out your eyes dude honestly

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2538
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    You don't have to be delusional to think Marquez won the second one, but ElTerrible Pacquaio put a beatdown on Barrera in their first fight, Barrera didn't give him fits. Barrera might have won a round, maybe.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1338
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: I'm not impressed with Juan Diaz

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    You don't have to be delusional to think Marquez won the second one, but ElTerrible Pacquaio put a beatdown on Barrera in their first fight, Barrera didn't give him fits. Barrera might have won a round, maybe.
    ok maybe i got a little carried away there lol but i honestly think that if the Barrera/Pacquiao rematch would have happened sooner, he could have beaten Pac

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 03:00 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing