Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
His crap defence hasn't stopped him winning.
Taylor is "half decent", no?
He lasted 12 rounds with Hopkins (twice), Pavlik, Winky, Spinks, Ouma, Lacy, Joppy and beat everyone else in under 12 rounds.
If Froch is garbage, yet was able to KO Taylor fair-and-square in his backyard, what does that make Taylor and all the fighters he has beaten?
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
How did he KO him fair and square ? He got took to school for 11 rounds and was on the brink of defeat before Taylor gassed in the last round. Taylor lost the fight. And yeah Taylor has had stamina issues for a while. Ask anybody on this site. On paper he may have lasted 12 rounds with those guys but you watch the fights and he has looked pretty bad in them bar Hopkins. The Ouma fight was a classic example. Taylor's heart just doesn't belong in the sport.
Array
It was a 12x3 WBC championship fight. Not an 11x3. If you get knocked out at any point during the 12 rounds you have lost fair and square. Simple as.
The entire history of boxing would look TOTALLY different without these rules set in place.
Taylor's stamina "issues" are no different to Froch's bad defence. It's all part of boxing. All top fighters have different strong points. It doesn't make them GARBAGE!!!
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
I keep hearing all this about Taylor's stamina issues ! what issues he fought his heart out at a good pace with a fighter who made him work and was very very strong !
I didnt see Taylor fall apart in the last round and saw him get gurt by some thudding punches by a fighter that came on likea train , it does happen , what you say about Taylor you take away from Froch !
I give massive respect to Taylor he fought a hell of a fight and against most of the other top 10 supermiddles he'd have won , Froch walked through fire to win
Stop with all this Taylor fell apart nonsense
Last edited by Big Dick Whittington; 04-28-2009 at 11:58 AM. Reason: mistake
Array
Array
i'm not calling Froch garbage but he clearly is a flawed fighter, and yes Taylor's stamina did play a part into the way the fight played out, he was dominating Froch until he started to tire, he was hurt just the same against Pavlik for the same reason, and in the first Hopkins fight (what should have been Taylor's first loss), B-Hop nearly had him out of there in the last rounds, so it's a bit of a pattern
Array
HOW MANY MORE TIMES FOR FUUCKS SAKES!!
He has got away with being poor by not meeting any top supermiddles yet!
Taylor is a faded middle, he tried his luck at a heavier weight, he weighed in 2lbs under the limit, hes not a supermiddle.
Little fighters like Spinks did better with Taylor
All Froch had over Taylor here is a strength advantage, I said it before the fight that Taylor is not strong enough at this weight, he might last in to the 12th and drop, hurt and outpoint Froch but put him in with a decent supermiddle and see what happens![]()
Array
For some ungodly reason I have watched most of Taylor's fights. I am not a fan of his style or anything, but I do think he is a decent man.
When Taylor tries to open up and punch big he loses. He is a strict reflex type boxer. JT tried to decapitate Ouma and tired out really early in that fight. If any opponent watched that tape, they'd know 2 things; Weather what he brings early and find an answer for his jab. JT gets really caught up trying to be a crowd pleaser and loses focus.
And JT complained all the time about making weight. He was a HUGE MW! I think he would have moved up around the same time regardless of his loses to Pavlik.
Having said all of this.. I look forward to JTs next fight. Hell, he brings it. What more can you ask for? He's athletic as they come, but chooses to give up a lot of his physical advantages.
"Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."
- and I quote from some random guy on the internet
Any fighter that beat Bernard Hopkins...TWICE...deserves great credit. He has all the physical tools to be a tremendous fighter...but i just feel like he lost his way after the Hopkins fights. He has great jab...but he abandoned it for a while. One can question his stamina as well....but that was never an issue when he fought Hopkins. I think after those fights he changed his style to his detriment. He tried to bang more instead of using his great skills to box more. I also give him props from coming back from that first Pavlik knockout and fighting so well (even though he lost) in the rematch. This last loss will sting...simply because he let it get away. But he has the tools...just needs to sharpen his mind.
Array
err what? Losing to a guy is better than knocking him out?
Froch's defence hasn't stopped him from winning. That's a fact.
Taylor went the distance with Hopkins (twice), Pavlik, Winky, Spinks, Ouma, Lacy and Joppy. That's a fact.
Froch knocked Taylor out. That's a fact.
It doesn't matter how shit Froch is, it doesn't matter that he was being outboxed - he WON!!! He bettered a whole host of world-class fighters.
And that's another fact.![]()
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
FACT
Array
It's all about the facts. (This time real ones.)
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Array
There's a lot of factual stuff going on around here!
Taylor is a decent fighter, and Froch knocked him out. I don't see what the argument is here. Froch did what he needed to do.
I think his style will see him falter sooner rather than later, but that argument is neither here nor there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks