Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: What would PBF vs Pac meat to boxing History?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,788
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1222
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would PBF vs Pac meat to boxing History?

    What does it mean for boxing? It means 500+ Anti Mayweather threads about how Pacquiao is gonna destroy Mayweather and after Mayweather wins another 1000+ threads about why Mayweather deserves no credit.
    Life is still worth while If You Just Smile - MJ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2487
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would PBF vs Pac meat to boxing History?

    I dont understand the question , what has MEAT go to do with anything ?
    or are you talking about something else ?

  3. #3
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: What would PBF vs Pac meat to boxing History?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    I dont understand the question , what has MEAT go to do with anything ?
    or are you talking about something else ?
    I think the TS meant "mean" instead of "meat"...

    So PAC vs. PBF will be P4P#1 vs. P4P#2 but GBP/MP shamelessly promoting the PBF-JMM fight as "Number One vs. Numero Uno" (being disrespectful to PAC's current status)...
    .

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1153
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What would PBF vs Pac meat to boxing History?

    Quote Originally Posted by Majesty View Post
    What does it mean for boxing? It means 500+ Anti Mayweather threads about how Pacquiao is gonna destroy Mayweather and after Mayweather wins another 1000+ threads about why Mayweather deserves no credit.

    You're probably barking up the right tree. If Pac wins he'll be given all his due credit. If PBF wins he'll be given the, "he should fight Mosley, Cotto, or Pac was too small." But I think we are getting too presumptous. JMM has proven he is just as good as Pac. PBF-Pac is light years away.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. A new Era in Boxing history.
    By Jimanuel Boogustus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-12-2007, 11:36 PM
  2. Boxing History
    By vickstar in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-04-2006, 05:13 AM
  3. Vic and Bob in meat festival
    By AdamGB in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-13-2006, 04:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing