The Mayweather double standard.

[Julius Rain]

he started at 130, and just by looking at him you can tell he's no natural welterweight, and IMO his resume at 130 and 135 is a hell of a lot more impressive than Pacquiao's, but the not gonna bother arguing it until the actual PBF/PAC fight is on

So what is he then a natural lightweight? why dont he fight jmm at lightweight then since jmm is the number 1 lightweight or alteast fight him at 140.

floyds resume better then pac from 130 to 135

Mayweather

Genaro Hernandez (only had lost to DLH)

Angel Manfredy (his only losses at that point were early on in his career, and at that time this fight was also conisdered 50/50, Floyd easily blasted him out of there)

Diego Corrales (was undefeated, basically considered a 50/50 fight, and Floyd dominated in every way possible, Corrales went on to be the man at lightweight)

Carlos Hernandez (went on to win a world title and give Morales all he could handle)

Jesus Chavez (went on to win a title and also became the man at lightweight at one point)

Jose Luis Castillo (twice, first was controversial, but he boxed cirlces IMO easily against him in the rematch)

Pacquiao

Erik Morales (lost the first fight clearly, won twice, and by this point he already had lost to Raheem, leading to the suspicion that he was shot, it turned out to be true)

Barrera (first was a good win but that was at featherweight, second was the same as above)

Oscar Larios (jumped from Super Bantamweight, to Super Featherweight to fight Manny, and had just been beaten up badly by Vazquez)

Juan Manuel Marquez (many believe that Pacquiao didn't even win the fight)

and David Diaz (a shot Morales should have gotten the UD against Diaz, enough said)

not saying that Pacquiao isn't on Floyd's level overall, but the FACT is, in those two weight classes Mayweather had better wins

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

[ElTerribleMorales]

So what is he then a natural lightweight? why dont he fight jmm at lightweight then since jmm is the number 1 lightweight or alteast fight him at 140.

floyds resume better then pac from 130 to 135

Mayweather

Genaro Hernandez (only had lost to DLH)

Angel Manfredy (his only losses at that point were early on in his career, and at that time this fight was also conisdered 50/50, Floyd easily blasted him out of there)

Diego Corrales (was undefeated, basically considered a 50/50 fight, and Floyd dominated in every way possible, Corrales went on to be the man at lightweight)

Carlos Hernandez (went on to win a world title and give Morales all he could handle)

Jesus Chavez (went on to win a title and also became the man at lightweight at one point)

Jose Luis Castillo (twice, first was controversial, but he boxed cirlces IMO easily against him in the rematch)

Pacquiao

Erik Morales (lost the first fight clearly, won twice, and by this point he already had lost to Raheem, leading to the suspicion that he was shot, it turned out to be true)

Barrera (first was a good win but that was at featherweight, second was the same as above)

Oscar Larios (jumped from Super Bantamweight, to Super Featherweight to fight Manny, and had just been beaten up badly by Vazquez)

Juan Manuel Marquez (many believe that Pacquiao didn't even win the fight)

and David Diaz (a shot Morales should have gotten the UD against Diaz, enough said)

not saying that Pacquiao isn't on Floyd's level overall, but the FACT is, in those two weight classes Mayweather had better wins

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

MAB, Morales, and JMM are better than the fighters on Mayweather's record, but the point and time when Pacquiao fought 2 of them from 130 to 135, they were past it (Barrera & Morales), and he still didn't beat Marquez convincingly, Corrales and Castillo both are 2 HUGE wins especially when Mayweather beat both at their peaks, IMO Marquez is nothing like Castillo, no similarites in their styles what-so-ever, i agree Floyd should be taking the fight at 140, but to think that at his age he can go down to 135 after not being at the weight for so long is ridiculous, and yea i'd say PBF is more of a natural lightweight than a natural welter, same way as i still feel DLH was a natural welterweight and no middleweight, we know how his last effort at 147 turned out, i repeat i'm no big fan of either, i respect both but to say that Pacquiao is deserving of all the praise he gets and Mayweather is just a hype job is complete bullshit

[Majesty]

So what is he then a natural lightweight? why dont he fight jmm at lightweight then since jmm is the number 1 lightweight or alteast fight him at 140.

floyds resume better then pac from 130 to 135

Mayweather

Genaro Hernandez (only had lost to DLH)

Angel Manfredy (his only losses at that point were early on in his career, and at that time this fight was also conisdered 50/50, Floyd easily blasted him out of there)

Diego Corrales (was undefeated, basically considered a 50/50 fight, and Floyd dominated in every way possible, Corrales went on to be the man at lightweight)

Carlos Hernandez (went on to win a world title and give Morales all he could handle)

Jesus Chavez (went on to win a title and also became the man at lightweight at one point)

Jose Luis Castillo (twice, first was controversial, but he boxed cirlces IMO easily against him in the rematch)

Pacquiao

Erik Morales (lost the first fight clearly, won twice, and by this point he already had lost to Raheem, leading to the suspicion that he was shot, it turned out to be true)

Barrera (first was a good win but that was at featherweight, second was the same as above)

Oscar Larios (jumped from Super Bantamweight, to Super Featherweight to fight Manny, and had just been beaten up badly by Vazquez)

Juan Manuel Marquez (many believe that Pacquiao didn't even win the fight)

and David Diaz (a shot Morales should have gotten the UD against Diaz, enough said)

not saying that Pacquiao isn't on Floyd's level overall, but the FACT is, in those two weight classes Mayweather had better wins

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

[Julius Rain]

Mayweather

Genaro Hernandez (only had lost to DLH)

Angel Manfredy (his only losses at that point were early on in his career, and at that time this fight was also conisdered 50/50, Floyd easily blasted him out of there)

Diego Corrales (was undefeated, basically considered a 50/50 fight, and Floyd dominated in every way possible, Corrales went on to be the man at lightweight)

Carlos Hernandez (went on to win a world title and give Morales all he could handle)

Jesus Chavez (went on to win a title and also became the man at lightweight at one point)

Jose Luis Castillo (twice, first was controversial, but he boxed cirlces IMO easily against him in the rematch)

Pacquiao

Erik Morales (lost the first fight clearly, won twice, and by this point he already had lost to Raheem, leading to the suspicion that he was shot, it turned out to be true)

Barrera (first was a good win but that was at featherweight, second was the same as above)

Oscar Larios (jumped from Super Bantamweight, to Super Featherweight to fight Manny, and had just been beaten up badly by Vazquez)

Juan Manuel Marquez (many believe that Pacquiao didn't even win the fight)

and David Diaz (a shot Morales should have gotten the UD against Diaz, enough said)

not saying that Pacquiao isn't on Floyd's level overall, but the FACT is, in those two weight classes Mayweather had better wins

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Pac dominated marco both times, people can say marco was past it but there always saying that everytime he is losing. Em on the other hand did beat pac the first fight which was a close fight im sure we both will agree. If people are making excuses for these to great mexican fighters that they were past it well was pac primed when he dominated marco? lost to eric,knock him twice and then drew with jmm? won in the rematch? Aint that the double standard when it comes to pac?

OK you are right floyd demolish everybody he fought, but i'll ask you a simple question. Is he as ambitious when it come to having a tough fighting schedule like pac?

Pac: within about 15 months - mab(first fight at 126), jmm, eric(first fight at 130) = two different division.

Pac : within about 14 months - jmm, diaz, oscar, hatton = 4 different divison

Pac: next - cotto?, floyd/jmm winner?, mosley?

If floyd was as tough as pac he would of fought casamayor,koysta,mosely, cotto,margarito, williams, a long time ago or atleast one of them no but his fighting a lightweight champion currently

[ElTerribleMorales]

[quote=Julius Rain;731356]

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Pac dominated marco both times, people can say marco was past it but there always saying that everytime he is losing. Em on the other hand did beat pac the first fight which was a close fight im sure we both will agree. If people are making excuses for these to great mexican fighters that they were past it well was pac primed when he dominated marco? lost to eric,knock him twice and then drew with jmm? won in the rematch? Aint that the double standard when it comes to pac?

who did Morales ever beat AFTER losing to RAHEEM? that's right, nobody, and yea i am one of the people that now credits a portion of Morales' win to Manny's lack of experience and although i feel prime for prime Morales had the style to beat Pacquiao, i think that the Morales that beat Pacquiao would lose to the Manny of now

OK you are right floyd demolish everybody he fought, but i'll ask you a simple question. Is he as ambitious when it come to having a tough fighting schedule like pac?

Pac: within about 15 months - mab(first fight at 126), jmm, eric(first fight at 130) = two different division.

Pac : within about 14 months - jmm, diaz, oscar, hatton = 4 different divison

Pac: next - cotto?, floyd/jmm winner?, mosley?

If floyd was as tough as pac he would of fought casamayor,koysta,mosely, cotto,margarito, williams, a long time ago or atleast one of them no but his fighting a lightweight champion currently

on that same note, if Manny was so tough he would have given Marquez an immediate rematch instead of jumping weight to fight the bum David Diaz, a weight drained shot DLH, and Mayweather's leftovers, is that how i feel, no, i give credit where credit is due, and IMO even though i feel Mayweather would beat Pacquiao, and that he's more skilled than him, i think both fighters have accomplished just as much, unlike you, i'm giving an un-biased opinion

[killersheep]

People think this argument can end

[Majesty]

People think this argument can end

It wouldnt end even if Mayweather beat Pacquiao, Cotto and Mosley

[ElTerribleMorales]

People think this argument can end

It wouldnt end even if Mayweather beat Pacquiao, Cotto, Mosley, Angulo, Williams, Kirkland, Abraham, Pavlik, Wright, Taylor, Froch, Bute, Andrade, Kessler, Hopkins, Calzaghe, Jones Jr, Dawson, Johnson, Adamek, Peter, Chambers, Haye, Wlad and Vitali

fixed it lol

[Julius Rain]

[quote=ElTerribleMorales;731362]

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

who did Morales ever beat AFTER losing to RAHEEM? that's right, nobody, and yea i am one of the people that now credits a portion of Morales' win to Manny's lack of experience and although i feel prime for prime Morales had the style to beat Pacquiao, i think that the Morales that beat Pacquiao would lose to the Manny of now

OK you are right floyd demolish everybody he fought, but i'll ask you a simple question. Is he as ambitious when it come to having a tough fighting schedule like pac?

Pac: within about 15 months - mab(first fight at 126), jmm, eric(first fight at 130) = two different division.

Pac : within about 14 months - jmm, diaz, oscar, hatton = 4 different divison

Pac: next - cotto?, floyd/jmm winner?, mosley?

If floyd was as tough as pac he would of fought casamayor,koysta,mosely, cotto,margarito, williams, a long time ago or atleast one of them no but his fighting a lightweight champion currently

on that same note, if Manny was so tough he would have given Marquez an immediate rematch instead of jumping weight to fight the bum David Diaz, a weight drained shot DLH, and Mayweather's leftovers, is that how i feel, no, i give credit where credit is due, and IMO even though i feel Mayweather would beat Pacquiao, and that he's more skilled than him, i think both fighters have accomplished just as much, unlike you, i'm giving an un-biased opinion

I can be unbias against floyd because he does run his mouth like his so great but his not facing great opposition like pac is. Everybody knows floyd is very talented but he rather talk about how good he is instead of finding out for sure, like what pac is doing. He is challenging himself time after time. Ofcourse the results wont be as perfect as floyds fight result thats because pac is fighting the best as consistent as possible.

I agree with you about Eric, IMO eric has better chance beating pac then mab. I think pac has mabs number and if eric jmm fought I'll bet on eric.

You ask why didn't pac fight jmm right away after there second fight? you mean like how izzy gave rafa an immediate third match? I think it would of been a bad move if they fought right away after the second because look what both guys has done since. jmm lightweight king, pac lightwelterweight king. Do you remember what happen after the first fight? why did jmm disagree in a rematch right away? instead he went to indonesia and got robbed.

You can't call david diaz a bum, his the same guy that ko'ed the guy that defeated casamayor before jmm did.

you can't call oscar dela hoya floyds left over or hatton, floyd barely won against oscar and pac ko'ed hatton 5 times faster in hattons division

you said your not being unbias but you claim floyd obviously has the better record

casamayor,koysta,mosely, cotto,margarito, williams, a long time ago or atleast one of them no but his fighting a lightweight champion currently

If Pacquiao was so tough why didn't he fight Vasquez, Marquez, Gonzalez, Guzman, Casamayor, Diaz(juan) and Larios(in his prime not after Vasquez already had knocked him out a fight before)

It can go both ways if you wanna cherry pick who he didn't fight.

The difference is Vasquez, Marquez, Gonzalez were not in the same time as pac was when pac was at bantamweight. Pac fought Larios only because nobody wanted to step up and fight pac in manila. Pac wanted a hometown match, only larios was willing to come up and take on the opportunity. Guzman Pac never happen because of the obvious, Casamayor Pac could of happen if pac didn't take on bigger guys after testing the waters with david diaz. Juan Pac didnt happen because of the same reason. And now that JMM has dispose of those two theres little point of pac facing them now.

See floyd jump up weight classes to take titles from selected oppenents. Pac actually face great fighters along his way to the p4p rankings. Including floyds greatest rival; hatton and dela hoya.

People think this argument can end

yea your right but this is what we're here for, just a fun debate.no harm at all.

[Violent Demise]

You ask why didn't pac fight jmm right away after there second fight? you mean like how izzy gave rafa an immediate third match? I think it would of been a bad move if they fought right away after the second because look what both guys has done since. jmm lightweight king, pac lightwelterweight king. Do you remember what happen after the first fight? why did jmm disagree in a rematch right away? instead he went to indonesia and got robbed.

You can't call david diaz a bum, his the same guy that ko'ed the guy that defeated casamayor before jmm did.

you can't call oscar dela hoya floyds left over or hatton, floyd barely won against oscar and pac ko'ed hatton 5 times faster in hattons division

you said your not being unbias but you claim floyd obviously has the better record

The Marquez-Pacqiauo rematch didn't happen right away cuz of bullshiit from Arum and Pacquiao. They promised him $1.5 million and then tried to come at him with $750,000. What the fukk was that? Really it wasn't even about the money. It was the pricipal. After there second fight Marquez and Golden Boy offered Pacquiao 6 million (at that time a career high purse). Pac turned it down. He took less money to face a much, much lesser fighter. Facts don't lie.

And David Diaz is a bum

[Majesty]

casamayor,koysta,mosely, cotto,margarito, williams, a long time ago or atleast one of them no but his fighting a lightweight champion currently

If Pacquiao was so tough why didn't he fight Vasquez, Marquez, Gonzalez, Guzman, Casamayor, Diaz(juan) and Larios(in his prime not after Vasquez already had knocked him out a fight before)

It can go both ways if you wanna cherry pick who he didn't fight.

[levi#1BoxingFan]

Mayweather

Genaro Hernandez (only had lost to DLH)

Angel Manfredy (his only losses at that point were early on in his career, and at that time this fight was also conisdered 50/50, Floyd easily blasted him out of there)

Diego Corrales (was undefeated, basically considered a 50/50 fight, and Floyd dominated in every way possible, Corrales went on to be the man at lightweight)

Carlos Hernandez (went on to win a world title and give Morales all he could handle)

Jesus Chavez (went on to win a title and also became the man at lightweight at one point)

Jose Luis Castillo (twice, first was controversial, but he boxed cirlces IMO easily against him in the rematch)

Pacquiao

Erik Morales (lost the first fight clearly, won twice, and by this point he already had lost to Raheem, leading to the suspicion that he was shot, it turned out to be true)

Barrera (first was a good win but that was at featherweight, second was the same as above)

Oscar Larios (jumped from Super Bantamweight, to Super Featherweight to fight Manny, and had just been beaten up badly by Vazquez)

Juan Manuel Marquez (many believe that Pacquiao didn't even win the fight)

and David Diaz (a shot Morales should have gotten the UD against Diaz, enough said)

not saying that Pacquiao isn't on Floyd's level overall, but the FACT is, in those two weight classes Mayweather had better wins

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

[JonesJrMayweather]

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

[skel1983]

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

Pacman would destroy Chico, i love Chicco but Pac is far to skilled for Corrales

[JonesJrMayweather]

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

Pacman would destroy Chico, i love Chicco but Pac is far to skilled for Corrales

NOW he is...back then when before chico fought castillo, pacman wasn't as sound as he is now. that's why he couldn't finish JMM after three knockdowns...