Quote Originally Posted by JoeyUK View Post
Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
Had the result been the other way round, Khan got nutted but wobbled Barrera, they let it go 5 and gave Barrera a win. Would there be calls for a rematch ? Ofcourse there would. It would be a massive controversy. A rematch wouldnt even be debated, it would just automatically happen so why isnt it happening in this case?

Thats the point we are making
The thing is.. how hard would it of been for MAB to simply say " I don't want to continue " or even his corner to do so.. it isn't 100% up to the referee or the doctor, it's just as important to the boxer and his corner. So I keep hearing " yeah but he's mexican... he would of gone on if both of his legs had been broken and his arm bit off". Well that's his fault then isn't it.. the referee (or was it the doctor?) had a long talk with him in the 3rd or 4th round and asked him if he wanted to continue, he said yes.. it's that simple.

Look at it this way, if you were about to get into a fight with someone twice as big as you, and your best friend is telling you not to fight, you shouldnt do it etc but you still do, then you get your ass handed to you.. then you cry to your friend " why did you let me fight "... this is same kinda situation. It isn't Khans fault. It isn't the referees fault. It's Marco's fault...
Amazing. It's now Barreras' fault for not quitting?
What don't people understand? It is not up to the fighter to quit. It was a matter of safety and that's what the Dr. and ref are for. Watch the replay when the doc finally looks at the cut. It's dripping off his face.
A week later on prizefighter a cut less severe than that resulted in the fight getting stopped in the same round. Not five rounds later.

It was bullshit then and it's bullshit now.