As far as I'm concerned that WAS a prime Don Curry in there, just happens that night he came up against someone who refused to lose. It's not like there were signs like you could argue with Tyson, as Curry had looked awesome against McRory & Rodriguez before fighting Honeyghan.

On Tyson, personally I think that was prime Tyson. It's too easy to say someone wasn't prime just because they lose, and whilst I can see the argument with Tyson, I think that was the first time he got into the ring with a man who wasn't afraid of him & was that determined to beat him (obviously because of Douglas' mum passing). I generally think unless there's a particularly clear reason & the decline was very evident (as you could maybe argue with Tyson getting buzzed against Bruno) then we shouldn't always try to underrate a great upset by saying someone wasn't prime, just because we don't understand the logic of the underdog winning