They all wear pads, it's rugby with protection. I'd love to see them all without all that padding and helmets, they would pussy out of big tackles everytime.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
They all wear pads, it's rugby with protection. I'd love to see them all without all that padding and helmets, they would pussy out of big tackles everytime.
Array
Array
By the way, all the best American heavyweight boxers are doing sod all![]()
Array
And I agree with you. But most Americans don't even know what Rugby is, they don't even understand that American Football is the bastard child of Rugby but with pads. But it's considered the most hardcore sport to them.
This discussion isn't about whether boxing or American football is tougher, but it's boxing hands down. The recovery time for a boxing match is anywhere from a few weeks to months, while the NFL is 1 week.
maybe you should try playing football, there is no way you can tackle like that if oyu weren't wearing pads, in highschool there were many dislocated shoudlers because your body can't take hitting somebody htat hard without pads, the contact PSI is about 3x as hard as an average pro heavyweight, I believe its around 3500 psi, which is as powerful as crocodile closing its mouth.
Enough about rugby, I'm an American, I know about rugby, and it's like football the same way bareknuckle boxing is the same as today's boxing. Football IS a hardcore sport...the pads only encourage you to hit harder. The forward pass and other football plays also create higher impact collisions than rugby. If you lined up our greatest football players against your greatest rugby players and told them to play rugby or football, we'd clean your clocks....and I'm not talking about just the Greatest English Rugby Players or the Greatest Australian Rugby Players, I'm talking about THE Greatest Rugby Players regardless of what country they came from....that ought to stir the pot a bit
As per the American heavyweights, I think the amateur boxing system just got a little too full of itself and got lazy when it came to recruiting talented young fighters. Not every good American heavyweight is doing something else, there are DECENT American heavyweights who didn't get the training they needed to become good, there are guys out there right now who could have been trained up into something pretty good. Our problem right now is our guys get into boxing too late or they burn out too soon.
Array
A difference between Football and rugby is fitness. Football players are nowhere near as fit. They play for 10 seconds and have a minute break. Rugby players play for 40 minutes straight, have a 10 - 15 minute break and play another 40 minutes.
As football players stop every 10 seconds it gives them time to plan moves and for the other team to set up their defence. In rugby you need to work to get back if you are in defence. You also have to support you own team mates when they get tackled as if you don’t you’ll lose the ball.
Rugby is far superior IMO.
As for the boxing, it is probably true. There is more money to be made in football then boxing. Its only the super star boxers who make more money that football players.
PS
Jonah lomu would have been an ATG if he had played football. Look him up. 6' 6". 125 KG (20st). 100m in 10.88.
Last edited by robinswe01; 06-12-2009 at 09:34 AM.
Array
What I never understand about these types of statements is it always seems to be exclusively America's problem... As if there aren't any other sports in the world that might be taking away from other nations' boxing?!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks