Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 88

Thread: What do you think of Catch weights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    I heard the fight is gonna be somewhere 143-144. Pacquiao's best weight is at 140, and Cotto at 147. And they have to meet in the middle. Its a simple math.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,748
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1344
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Quinito View Post
    I heard the fight is gonna be somewhere 143-144. Pacquiao's best weight is at 140, and Cotto at 147. And they have to meet in the middle. Its a simple math.
    That's completely bogus logic though. If two guys are only truly effective at different weight divisions, then they shouldn't fight period. Calderon's best weight is 106, so the simple math would dictate that if he fought Pacquiao it should occur at 123 pounds right? Except no real fan want's to see a fight where both guys give up huge ground just to cash in off name recognition. If Cotto can't go below 147 without being weight drained, and Pacquiao doesn't think he can beat Miguel above 143 or whatever he wants, then it's just a tainted fight no matter what the outcome, and basically meaningless. I personally think Pacquiao could beat him handily at 147, so he should make the move up and give it a shot. If not every fight he has from now on could be a catchweight.. Mayweather or Mosley will want the fight at Welter as well, is he going to demand that they all come down in weight to fight him?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4371
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Quinito View Post
    I heard the fight is gonna be somewhere 143-144. Pacquiao's best weight is at 140, and Cotto at 147. And they have to meet in the middle. Its a simple math.
    That's completely bogus logic though. If two guys are only truly effective at different weight divisions, then they shouldn't fight period. Calderon's best weight is 106, so the simple math would dictate that if he fought Pacquiao it should occur at 123 pounds right? Except no real fan want's to see a fight where both guys give up huge ground just to cash in off name recognition. If Cotto can't go below 147 without being weight drained, and Pacquiao doesn't think he can beat Miguel above 143 or whatever he wants, then it's just a tainted fight no matter what the outcome, and basically meaningless. I personally think Pacquiao could beat him handily at 147, so he should make the move up and give it a shot. If not every fight he has from now on could be a catchweight.. Mayweather or Mosley will want the fight at Welter as well, is he going to demand that they all come down in weight to fight him?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    288
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    869
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    There really is no point in catchweights, this is why there are 15 divisions in Boxing (I'm not counting the last two Min. Weight and Light Fly) to avoid catchweights. If there were only 8 Divisions I could may'be see a catchweight here and there, but nowadays there doesn't need to be catchweights. If the Cotto-Pacquiao fight is going to be fought around 143-144, then it's a Welterweight fight. I don't care if they call it a catchweight or not. It's above the Jr. Welterweight limit and it's not passed the Welterweigh limit. So, tht means it's a Welterweight fight, fuck catchweights.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,604
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1607
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Not sure how i feel about them. They do leave a ton of room for excuses for the looser. If your best weight is at 140 then fight the guys there, the moment one of these guys loose the weight will be the first excuse. I know we want big fights but if the guys are fighting at weights they aren't the best in then you're just wasting our time. It's always all good before the fight, then after....
    Last edited by Mar; 06-15-2009 at 09:06 PM.
    Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2549
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Quinito View Post
    I heard the fight is gonna be somewhere 143-144. Pacquiao's best weight is at 140, and Cotto at 147. And they have to meet in the middle. Its a simple math.
    That's completely bogus logic though. If two guys are only truly effective at different weight divisions, then they shouldn't fight period. Calderon's best weight is 106, so the simple math would dictate that if he fought Pacquiao it should occur at 123 pounds right? Except no real fan want's to see a fight where both guys give up huge ground just to cash in off name recognition. If Cotto can't go below 147 without being weight drained, and Pacquiao doesn't think he can beat Miguel above 143 or whatever he wants, then it's just a tainted fight no matter what the outcome, and basically meaningless. I personally think Pacquiao could beat him handily at 147, so he should make the move up and give it a shot. If not every fight he has from now on could be a catchweight.. Mayweather or Mosley will want the fight at Welter as well, is he going to demand that they all come down in weight to fight him?
    100% agree with this.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. When will the war catch up with Cotto?
    By littlebif in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-15-2009, 11:24 PM
  2. Catch Me Up
    By amat in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 06:22 PM
  3. is this not the greatest catch ever seen?
    By TheChosenOne in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-20-2008, 02:30 AM
  4. Anyone catch the Berto fight?
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-24-2008, 07:32 PM
  5. anyone else catch the beef
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-06-2006, 01:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing